Upper graph: Recognition errors (group mean +/- SE following stimulation of Oz (control site) and pSTG (experimental site).

Tsung-Ren Huang (324812)
Takeo Watanabe (23089)

February 2013

The number identification and scene recognition accuracy (y-axis) are averaged from all participa...

Group average perceptual performance, shown for PSS (left panel) and threshold estimates (right panel) of fitted psychometric functions, respectively.

Florian Ostendorf (351338)
Raymond J. Dolan (209991)

January 2015

Diamonds represent predictions for COMBI condition, as expected from average estimates in single ...

Results obtained for three different tasks during two trials.

Álvaro Costa (659402)
Enrique Hortal (659403)
Eduardo Iáñez (430386)
José M. Azorín (2627074)

November 2014

Signals from the right graph represent two trials (blue and green) where the user clenches the ri...

Upper graph: Recognition errors (group mean +/- SE following stimulation of Oz (control site) and IFG (experimental site).

Anke Ninija Karabanov (713968)
Rainer Paine (713969)
Chi Chao Chao (713970)
Katrin Schulze (713971)
Brian Scott (713972)
Mark Hallett (192280)
Mortimer Mishkin (713973)

March 2015

Lower graph: Each participant's recognition errors following stimulation of Oz and IFG.</p

Results obtained by all the participants.

Alessia Tonelli (2816437)
Luca Brayda (2816440)
Monica Gori (201213)

June 2016

(A) In the graph the percentage of correct responses obtained in the training session (x) and in ...

Pattern of compensation of a typical participant in the: A) reinforcement group, B) reinforcement + error group, and C) error group.

Joshua G. A. Cashaback (4285276)
Heather R. McGregor (4285279)
Ayman Mohatarem (4285273)
Paul L. Gribble (90279)

July 2017

All experimental trials are represented in the line graph (bins 1–50), where each point represent...

Progress of mean total integration scores during the STRETCH trial.

Kerry E. Uebel (275862)
Gina Joubert (275863)
Edwin Wouters (275864)
Willie F. Mollentze (275865)
Dingie H. C. J. van Rensburg (275866)

January 2013

Line graph of mean total integration scores at intervention and control clinics plotted against m...

Mean percentage correct discrimination for each stimulus triplet.

Sanne Boesveldt (512938)
Johan N. Lundström (161035)

January 2014

In all graphs: Error bars denote standard deviation, and stars above bar denotes results signific...

Comparison among patient groups in cognitive profiles expressed as z-scores.

Mélanie Planton (4060738)
Laure Saint-Aubert (3463088)
Nicolas Raposo (4060732)
Laura Branchu (4060723)
Aicha Lyoubi (4060729)
Fabrice Bonneville (4060741)
Jean-François Albucher (4060726)
Jean-Marc Olivot (4060735)
Patrice Péran (4060744)
Jérémie Pariente (3484709)

June 2017

The diamond symbols represent the mean z-score value for the group, and error bars represe...

Results of the behavioral categorization task.

Ana Torralbo (394348)
Dirk B. Walther (357621)
Barry Chai (394349)
Eamon Caddigan (394350)
Li Fei-Fei (394351)
Diane M. Beck (394352)

March 2013

Graph depicts categorization accuracy of good (green) and bad exemplars (orange) across categorie...

Graphs of the Fluctuation of the P-score Classified into 4 Groups.

Masaya Tayama (300018)
Masaru Tateno (283565)
Tae Woo Park (300020)
Wataru Ukai (272774)
Eri Hashimoto (272775)
Toshikazu Saito (272776)

February 2013

A: Upward type, B: Downward type, C: Repetition type, D: Unspecified type The solid lines represe...

Behavioral results.

Michiel van Elk (204637)
Roel Bousardt (323376)
Harold Bekkering (323377)
Hein T. van Schie (323378)

February 2013

Error rates in response to object questions (left graph) or to grip questions (right graph). Bars...

Behavioral performance.

Guy Vingerhoets (439767)
Jo Nys (439768)
Pieterjan Honoré (439769)
Elisabeth Vandekerckhove (439770)
Pieter Vandemaele (439771)

July 2013

Left hand graph depicts percent accuracy scores in the four conditions. Right hand graph illustra...

Recognition task data.

Christianne Jacobs (119757)
Tom A. de Graaf (119759)
Rainer Goebel (53057)
Alexander T. Sack (119761)

November 2012

A) Difference scores between accuracies, defined as the percentage correct responses, in the EVC ...

Main results.

Maarten Demeyer (349462)
Peter De Graef (349463)
Karl Verfaillie (202701)
Johan Wagemans (137648)

February 2013

Panel a) displays the proportion correct and Panel b) the reaction time results for the transsacc...

Task performance.

Tsung-Ren Huang (324812)
Takeo Watanabe (23089)

February 2013

The number identification and scene recognition accuracy (y-axis) are averaged from all participa...

Group average perceptual performance, shown for PSS (left panel) and threshold estimates (right panel) of fitted psychometric functions, respectively.

Florian Ostendorf (351338)
Raymond J. Dolan (209991)

January 2015

Diamonds represent predictions for COMBI condition, as expected from average estimates in single ...

Results obtained for three different tasks during two trials.

Álvaro Costa (659402)
Enrique Hortal (659403)
Eduardo Iáñez (430386)
José M. Azorín (2627074)

November 2014

Signals from the right graph represent two trials (blue and green) where the user clenches the ri...

Upper graph: Recognition errors (group mean +/- SE following stimulation of Oz (control site) and IFG (experimental site).

Anke Ninija Karabanov (713968)
Rainer Paine (713969)
Chi Chao Chao (713970)
Katrin Schulze (713971)
Brian Scott (713972)
Mark Hallett (192280)
Mortimer Mishkin (713973)

March 2015

Lower graph: Each participant's recognition errors following stimulation of Oz and IFG.</p

Results obtained by all the participants.

Alessia Tonelli (2816437)
Luca Brayda (2816440)
Monica Gori (201213)

June 2016

(A) In the graph the percentage of correct responses obtained in the training session (x) and in ...

Pattern of compensation of a typical participant in the: A) reinforcement group, B) reinforcement + error group, and C) error group.

Joshua G. A. Cashaback (4285276)
Heather R. McGregor (4285279)
Ayman Mohatarem (4285273)
Paul L. Gribble (90279)

July 2017

All experimental trials are represented in the line graph (bins 1–50), where each point represent...

Progress of mean total integration scores during the STRETCH trial.

Kerry E. Uebel (275862)
Gina Joubert (275863)
Edwin Wouters (275864)
Willie F. Mollentze (275865)
Dingie H. C. J. van Rensburg (275866)

January 2013

Line graph of mean total integration scores at intervention and control clinics plotted against m...

Mean percentage correct discrimination for each stimulus triplet.

Sanne Boesveldt (512938)
Johan N. Lundström (161035)

January 2014

In all graphs: Error bars denote standard deviation, and stars above bar denotes results signific...

Comparison among patient groups in cognitive profiles expressed as z-scores.

Mélanie Planton (4060738)
Laure Saint-Aubert (3463088)
Nicolas Raposo (4060732)
Laura Branchu (4060723)
Aicha Lyoubi (4060729)
Fabrice Bonneville (4060741)
Jean-François Albucher (4060726)
Jean-Marc Olivot (4060735)
Patrice Péran (4060744)
Jérémie Pariente (3484709)

June 2017

The diamond symbols represent the mean z-score value for the group, and error bars represe...

Results of the behavioral categorization task.

Ana Torralbo (394348)
Dirk B. Walther (357621)
Barry Chai (394349)
Eamon Caddigan (394350)
Li Fei-Fei (394351)
Diane M. Beck (394352)

March 2013

Graph depicts categorization accuracy of good (green) and bad exemplars (orange) across categorie...

Graphs of the Fluctuation of the P-score Classified into 4 Groups.

Masaya Tayama (300018)
Masaru Tateno (283565)
Tae Woo Park (300020)
Wataru Ukai (272774)
Eri Hashimoto (272775)
Toshikazu Saito (272776)

February 2013

A: Upward type, B: Downward type, C: Repetition type, D: Unspecified type The solid lines represe...

Behavioral results.

Michiel van Elk (204637)
Roel Bousardt (323376)
Harold Bekkering (323377)
Hein T. van Schie (323378)

February 2013

Error rates in response to object questions (left graph) or to grip questions (right graph). Bars...

Behavioral performance.

Guy Vingerhoets (439767)
Jo Nys (439768)
Pieterjan Honoré (439769)
Elisabeth Vandekerckhove (439770)
Pieter Vandemaele (439771)

July 2013

Left hand graph depicts percent accuracy scores in the four conditions. Right hand graph illustra...

Recognition task data.

Christianne Jacobs (119757)
Tom A. de Graaf (119759)
Rainer Goebel (53057)
Alexander T. Sack (119761)

November 2012

A) Difference scores between accuracies, defined as the percentage correct responses, in the EVC ...

Main results.

Maarten Demeyer (349462)
Peter De Graef (349463)
Karl Verfaillie (202701)
Johan Wagemans (137648)

February 2013

Panel a) displays the proportion correct and Panel b) the reaction time results for the transsacc...

Task performance.

Tsung-Ren Huang (324812)
Takeo Watanabe (23089)

February 2013

The number identification and scene recognition accuracy (y-axis) are averaged from all participa...

Group average perceptual performance, shown for PSS (left panel) and threshold estimates (right panel) of fitted psychometric functions, respectively.

Florian Ostendorf (351338)
Raymond J. Dolan (209991)

January 2015

Diamonds represent predictions for COMBI condition, as expected from average estimates in single ...

Results obtained for three different tasks during two trials.

Álvaro Costa (659402)
Enrique Hortal (659403)
Eduardo Iáñez (430386)
José M. Azorín (2627074)

November 2014

Signals from the right graph represent two trials (blue and green) where the user clenches the ri...

Upper graph: Recognition errors (group mean +/- SE following stimulation of Oz (control site) and pSTG (experimental site).

Abstract

Extracted data

Upper graph: Recognition errors (group mean +/- SE following stimulation of Oz (control site) and pSTG (experimental site).

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items