Background: Previous studies have evaluated whether the addition of multiple laboratory and clinical factors to administrative data, or reabstraction of administrative data, improve the accuracy of risk adjustment. This study assessed if a more feasible strategy of adding 3 readily accessible clinical variables to hospital administrative data might improve the risk adjustment for interhospital comparisons. Objectives: We compared 3 alternative risk adjustment models for 30-day case-fatality rates (CFR) after admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI): (1) administrative model (age, sex, and comorbidities); (2) clinical-augmented administrative model (administrative data plus 3 clinical variables: systolic blood pressure, heart rate, an...
Background: There is increasing interest in clinical research with electronic medical data, but it o...
BACKGROUND: Hospital performance measures based on patient mortality and readmission have indicated ...
OBJECTIVES: This research examined whether judgments about a hospital\u27s risk-adjusted mortality p...
Context Comparisons of risk-adjusted hospital performance often are important components of public r...
Background: Hospital discharge records (HDRs) are routinely used to assess outcomes of care and to c...
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials concerning acute myocardial infarction often evaluate short-term death. ...
We compared measures of hospital performance by using both administrative and clinical data sources....
Hospital mortality statistics derived from administrative data may not adjust adequately for patient...
Background Comparison of the outcomes of care provided by hospitals is a growing trend. Outcomes ...
Background and Objective: To compare levels of and trends in incidence and hospital mortality of fi...
Objectives To develop a model of in-hospital mortality using medical record front page (MRFP) data a...
ObjectiveTo evaluate how the accuracy of present-on-admission (POA) reporting affects hospital 30-da...
Methods for comparing hospitals regarding cardiac arrest (CA) outcomes, vital for improving resuscit...
BACKGROUND: No data exist regarding time trends of 28-day case fatality (CF) of patients with presum...
Objectives: To compare results of statistical process-control analyses of in-hospital deaths of pati...
Background: There is increasing interest in clinical research with electronic medical data, but it o...
BACKGROUND: Hospital performance measures based on patient mortality and readmission have indicated ...
OBJECTIVES: This research examined whether judgments about a hospital\u27s risk-adjusted mortality p...
Context Comparisons of risk-adjusted hospital performance often are important components of public r...
Background: Hospital discharge records (HDRs) are routinely used to assess outcomes of care and to c...
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials concerning acute myocardial infarction often evaluate short-term death. ...
We compared measures of hospital performance by using both administrative and clinical data sources....
Hospital mortality statistics derived from administrative data may not adjust adequately for patient...
Background Comparison of the outcomes of care provided by hospitals is a growing trend. Outcomes ...
Background and Objective: To compare levels of and trends in incidence and hospital mortality of fi...
Objectives To develop a model of in-hospital mortality using medical record front page (MRFP) data a...
ObjectiveTo evaluate how the accuracy of present-on-admission (POA) reporting affects hospital 30-da...
Methods for comparing hospitals regarding cardiac arrest (CA) outcomes, vital for improving resuscit...
BACKGROUND: No data exist regarding time trends of 28-day case fatality (CF) of patients with presum...
Objectives: To compare results of statistical process-control analyses of in-hospital deaths of pati...
Background: There is increasing interest in clinical research with electronic medical data, but it o...
BACKGROUND: Hospital performance measures based on patient mortality and readmission have indicated ...
OBJECTIVES: This research examined whether judgments about a hospital\u27s risk-adjusted mortality p...