<p>The number of eggs laid in between matings was used as a covariate.</p><p>Generalized linear model of the effects of three molecular-weight fractions of male accessory gland extract (treatment) and the number of days in between matings (days) on the sperm competitive success of the second male in double mating experiments (N = 29–37 females per day and treatment group).</p
<p>The relationship between the differential siring success of males in sperm competition and (A) th...
Results from the general linear model on semen parameters in a subgroup of 600 patients.</p
<p>Bold P-values indicate significant effects, bold italics indicate statistical trends.</p
<p>The number of eggs laid in between matings was used as a covariate.</p><p>Generalized linear mode...
<p>Generalized linear model of the effects of different molecular-weight fractions of male accessory...
<p>Non-significant interactions were removed to avoid over-parameterization.</p><p>Generalized linea...
<p>General Linear Repeated Measures Model. Final model, where response variable is Sperm Viability (...
Results of mating competition experiments. For each individual mating trial the block and replicate ...
<p>The figure shows the mean (± SE) degree of second male sperm precedence when females remated to a...
<p>Fertilization success was measured as within-pair (WP) fertilization success (males that had not ...
<p>Square brackets indicate effect nesting.</p><p>Sample sizes were 469 females and 304 males.</p
A complete understanding of male reproductive success, and thus sexual selection, often requires an ...
<p>The model includes: group, mating duration (min), type of insertion (long/short), male and female...
A complete understanding of male reproductive success, and thus sexual selection, often requires an ...
<p>The random species effects were as follows: PC1: variance component 0.585, 95% CI = 0.1081, 1.061...
<p>The relationship between the differential siring success of males in sperm competition and (A) th...
Results from the general linear model on semen parameters in a subgroup of 600 patients.</p
<p>Bold P-values indicate significant effects, bold italics indicate statistical trends.</p
<p>The number of eggs laid in between matings was used as a covariate.</p><p>Generalized linear mode...
<p>Generalized linear model of the effects of different molecular-weight fractions of male accessory...
<p>Non-significant interactions were removed to avoid over-parameterization.</p><p>Generalized linea...
<p>General Linear Repeated Measures Model. Final model, where response variable is Sperm Viability (...
Results of mating competition experiments. For each individual mating trial the block and replicate ...
<p>The figure shows the mean (± SE) degree of second male sperm precedence when females remated to a...
<p>Fertilization success was measured as within-pair (WP) fertilization success (males that had not ...
<p>Square brackets indicate effect nesting.</p><p>Sample sizes were 469 females and 304 males.</p
A complete understanding of male reproductive success, and thus sexual selection, often requires an ...
<p>The model includes: group, mating duration (min), type of insertion (long/short), male and female...
A complete understanding of male reproductive success, and thus sexual selection, often requires an ...
<p>The random species effects were as follows: PC1: variance component 0.585, 95% CI = 0.1081, 1.061...
<p>The relationship between the differential siring success of males in sperm competition and (A) th...
Results from the general linear model on semen parameters in a subgroup of 600 patients.</p
<p>Bold P-values indicate significant effects, bold italics indicate statistical trends.</p