<p>Percentage of cooperators when there are 60 <i>PD</i>, 20 <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> and 20 <i>SD</i><sub>2</sub> agents.</p
<p>On the top panel (a), corresponding players on two networks always have the same coupling strengt...
<p>Percentages of inter- and intradisciplinary win-win, win-lose, lose-win and lose-lose relationshi...
<p>It is interesting to observe that too high initial values of may act detrimental on the evolutio...
<p>Percentage of cooperators when there are 20 <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> and varying <i>PD</i> and <i>SD...
<p>Percentage of cooperators when there are 40 <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> and varying <i>PD</i> and <i>SD...
<p>Percentage of cooperators when there are different portions of <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>SD</i...
<p>Percentage of cooperators when there are different portions of <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> agents.</p
<p>Agents’ strategies when there are 29 <i>PD</i>, 20 <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> and 51 <i>SD</i><sub>2</...
<p>Four different situations are shown after 5 runs and 2000 iterations per simulation with <i>a</i>...
<p>Top Super-Cooperators, Comprising at Least 15% of All Cooperator Pairs in a Specific Congress</p
<p>Percentage of cooperators with respect to time for 2 different initial conditions for 5 runs and ...
<p>Percentage of cooperators with respect to time for 4 different initial conditions for 5 runs and ...
<p>Proportion of established links with defectors, cooperators, and unknown partners according to pl...
<p>The plot shows the evolution of the number of cooperators over a typical run (see also <a href="h...
<p>Panel (a) illustrates the average fraction of cooperators, while (b) corresponds to the level of ...
<p>On the top panel (a), corresponding players on two networks always have the same coupling strengt...
<p>Percentages of inter- and intradisciplinary win-win, win-lose, lose-win and lose-lose relationshi...
<p>It is interesting to observe that too high initial values of may act detrimental on the evolutio...
<p>Percentage of cooperators when there are 20 <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> and varying <i>PD</i> and <i>SD...
<p>Percentage of cooperators when there are 40 <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> and varying <i>PD</i> and <i>SD...
<p>Percentage of cooperators when there are different portions of <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>SD</i...
<p>Percentage of cooperators when there are different portions of <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> agents.</p
<p>Agents’ strategies when there are 29 <i>PD</i>, 20 <i>SD</i><sub>1</sub> and 51 <i>SD</i><sub>2</...
<p>Four different situations are shown after 5 runs and 2000 iterations per simulation with <i>a</i>...
<p>Top Super-Cooperators, Comprising at Least 15% of All Cooperator Pairs in a Specific Congress</p
<p>Percentage of cooperators with respect to time for 2 different initial conditions for 5 runs and ...
<p>Percentage of cooperators with respect to time for 4 different initial conditions for 5 runs and ...
<p>Proportion of established links with defectors, cooperators, and unknown partners according to pl...
<p>The plot shows the evolution of the number of cooperators over a typical run (see also <a href="h...
<p>Panel (a) illustrates the average fraction of cooperators, while (b) corresponds to the level of ...
<p>On the top panel (a), corresponding players on two networks always have the same coupling strengt...
<p>Percentages of inter- and intradisciplinary win-win, win-lose, lose-win and lose-lose relationshi...
<p>It is interesting to observe that too high initial values of may act detrimental on the evolutio...
DOI
Add to ORKG