<p>Pearson correlation coefficients (r) with the associated <i>P</i> values were shown for each genus of each group.</p
<p>*,**,*** indicate significance at P≤0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively.</p><p>n = 77.</p><p>Pearson ...
<p>This was calculated to evaluate the strength of the correlation depending of the period of the ye...
<p>Values in boldface type indicate significant correlations with <i>P</i> values indicated in super...
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients (r) with the associated <i>P</i> values were shown for each taxo...
Relative abundance of 25 distinct genera (%) and Pearson’s correlations with different forage-to-con...
<p>Correlation analysis of the genera relative abundances with the physicochemical parameters (n = 1...
Pearson's correlation between species richness/abundance with size of NPs across taxa.</p
<p><sup>a</sup> Significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) correlations are displayed in bold.</p><p>Lower left h...
Relative abundance of five distinct phyla (%) and Pearson’s correlations with different forage-to-co...
<p>The Pearson correlations between the relative abundances of the 9 dominant bacterial phyla and en...
<p>r: Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p>**means correlation is significant at the 0.01 level ...
<p>Number of individuals of all population, <i>N</i> = 711.</p><p>*** <i>P</i>< 0.0001; ns, nonsigni...
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients of genotype means of plant traits, autumn damage index (treated ...
<p>Relationships were assessed for both the logarithm (base 10) of the abundances variables (A) and ...
Pearson’s correlation coefficients (N = 63) between yield and weed parameters.</p
<p>*,**,*** indicate significance at P≤0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively.</p><p>n = 77.</p><p>Pearson ...
<p>This was calculated to evaluate the strength of the correlation depending of the period of the ye...
<p>Values in boldface type indicate significant correlations with <i>P</i> values indicated in super...
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients (r) with the associated <i>P</i> values were shown for each taxo...
Relative abundance of 25 distinct genera (%) and Pearson’s correlations with different forage-to-con...
<p>Correlation analysis of the genera relative abundances with the physicochemical parameters (n = 1...
Pearson's correlation between species richness/abundance with size of NPs across taxa.</p
<p><sup>a</sup> Significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05) correlations are displayed in bold.</p><p>Lower left h...
Relative abundance of five distinct phyla (%) and Pearson’s correlations with different forage-to-co...
<p>The Pearson correlations between the relative abundances of the 9 dominant bacterial phyla and en...
<p>r: Pearson's correlation coefficient.</p><p>**means correlation is significant at the 0.01 level ...
<p>Number of individuals of all population, <i>N</i> = 711.</p><p>*** <i>P</i>< 0.0001; ns, nonsigni...
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients of genotype means of plant traits, autumn damage index (treated ...
<p>Relationships were assessed for both the logarithm (base 10) of the abundances variables (A) and ...
Pearson’s correlation coefficients (N = 63) between yield and weed parameters.</p
<p>*,**,*** indicate significance at P≤0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively.</p><p>n = 77.</p><p>Pearson ...
<p>This was calculated to evaluate the strength of the correlation depending of the period of the ye...
<p>Values in boldface type indicate significant correlations with <i>P</i> values indicated in super...
DOI
Add to ORKG