<p>Outlines comparison between von Mises brick strain results (reported as mean [standard deviation]) for both the incomplete heterogenous and incomplete homogenous models under each of the five test loading regimes.</p><p>Results of comparative FEA between heterogenous and homogenous models.</p
<p>The differences between these comparisons based on the Mann-Whitney tests (n = 100 for each model...
<p>Comparison between standard fully adjusted models and non-linear models, according to goodness of...
Investigating differences between means of more than two groups or experimental conditions is a rout...
<p>Five different loading regimes were applied to both models (left) with resulting von Mises strain...
<p>Comparison of the pattern between models using various summary values. These were generated from ...
<p>The percent difference (%) between von Mises stresses for 15 landmarks under deciduous incisor (d...
<p>Comparison between experimental and the improved model under different strain rates.</p
The Mokken model of monotone homogeneity, the Mokken model of double monotonicity, and the Rasch m...
Mean and statistical comparison of cycles supported by the samples of each group in the 4 intensitie...
<p>The variation in strain differences is displayed as mean F-ratios (+ s.e.m.) of the ‘strain-by-la...
<p>df = degree of freedom; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual; RMSEA = root mean square e...
<p>Comparisons of model fit statistics between 2-factor and 3-factor models (n = 296).</p
the Mokken model of double monotonicity, and the Rasch model are theoretically and empirically compa...
<p>From top to bottom panel, each indicates the case of 0° model, 10° bent model and 20° bent model....
<p>Side by side comparison of the (A) total force, (B) root mean squared (RMS) and maximum tractions...
<p>The differences between these comparisons based on the Mann-Whitney tests (n = 100 for each model...
<p>Comparison between standard fully adjusted models and non-linear models, according to goodness of...
Investigating differences between means of more than two groups or experimental conditions is a rout...
<p>Five different loading regimes were applied to both models (left) with resulting von Mises strain...
<p>Comparison of the pattern between models using various summary values. These were generated from ...
<p>The percent difference (%) between von Mises stresses for 15 landmarks under deciduous incisor (d...
<p>Comparison between experimental and the improved model under different strain rates.</p
The Mokken model of monotone homogeneity, the Mokken model of double monotonicity, and the Rasch m...
Mean and statistical comparison of cycles supported by the samples of each group in the 4 intensitie...
<p>The variation in strain differences is displayed as mean F-ratios (+ s.e.m.) of the ‘strain-by-la...
<p>df = degree of freedom; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual; RMSEA = root mean square e...
<p>Comparisons of model fit statistics between 2-factor and 3-factor models (n = 296).</p
the Mokken model of double monotonicity, and the Rasch model are theoretically and empirically compa...
<p>From top to bottom panel, each indicates the case of 0° model, 10° bent model and 20° bent model....
<p>Side by side comparison of the (A) total force, (B) root mean squared (RMS) and maximum tractions...
<p>The differences between these comparisons based on the Mann-Whitney tests (n = 100 for each model...
<p>Comparison between standard fully adjusted models and non-linear models, according to goodness of...
Investigating differences between means of more than two groups or experimental conditions is a rout...