<p>1. <i>d</i> = difference in standard deviations from the first period to the last. For variables with a non-linear change, the <i>d</i> from the lowest to the highest point is shown in parentheses.</p><p>2. For all <i>d</i>’s >. 05, the 95% confidence interval does not include zero.</p><p>3. These questions were not asked in California after 1996; thus, MtF does not report separated means for the Western region after that year.</p><p>Moderators of time period/generational differences in religious orientation, American 12<sup>th</sup> graders, 1976–2013.</p
Despite the theoretical emphasis on religious decline in modern societies, sociologists remain divid...
<p>Differences in multi-year standard deviation between the IA and conventional methods for a). onse...
<p>Percentage of American adolescents endorsing “none” for religious affiliation, 1966–2014.</p
In four large, nationally representative surveys (N = 11.2 million), American adolescents and emergi...
Period and cohort effects on reports of no religious preference and religious disaffiliation are est...
Period and cohort effects on reports of no religious preference and religious disaffiliation are est...
Previous research found declines in Americans’ religious affiliation but few changes in ...
<p>Percentage of American adolescents who never attend religious services, 1966–2013 (note: 1966 col...
Although there has been a fast rise in the share of Americans reporting no religion, it is unclear w...
<p>Proportion of sample that maintained or changed their religious affiliation from 2009 to 2011.</p
<p>Note. The Mean difference is calculated by the scaled score based on Dutch norms minus the scaled...
We conduct an empirical test of the relationship between religious pluralism and religious participa...
Proportions of Christian-affiliated and religiously unaffiliated respondents by country for years 19...
Annual percent change in time trends of cause-specific age-standardized moratlity rates in Qatari an...
U.S. Protestants are less likely to belong to “mainline” denominations and more likely to belong to ...
Despite the theoretical emphasis on religious decline in modern societies, sociologists remain divid...
<p>Differences in multi-year standard deviation between the IA and conventional methods for a). onse...
<p>Percentage of American adolescents endorsing “none” for religious affiliation, 1966–2014.</p
In four large, nationally representative surveys (N = 11.2 million), American adolescents and emergi...
Period and cohort effects on reports of no religious preference and religious disaffiliation are est...
Period and cohort effects on reports of no religious preference and religious disaffiliation are est...
Previous research found declines in Americans’ religious affiliation but few changes in ...
<p>Percentage of American adolescents who never attend religious services, 1966–2013 (note: 1966 col...
Although there has been a fast rise in the share of Americans reporting no religion, it is unclear w...
<p>Proportion of sample that maintained or changed their religious affiliation from 2009 to 2011.</p
<p>Note. The Mean difference is calculated by the scaled score based on Dutch norms minus the scaled...
We conduct an empirical test of the relationship between religious pluralism and religious participa...
Proportions of Christian-affiliated and religiously unaffiliated respondents by country for years 19...
Annual percent change in time trends of cause-specific age-standardized moratlity rates in Qatari an...
U.S. Protestants are less likely to belong to “mainline” denominations and more likely to belong to ...
Despite the theoretical emphasis on religious decline in modern societies, sociologists remain divid...
<p>Differences in multi-year standard deviation between the IA and conventional methods for a). onse...
<p>Percentage of American adolescents endorsing “none” for religious affiliation, 1966–2014.</p