In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe agents and agent types in Defeasible Logic. We argue, in particular, that the introduction of obligations can provide a new reading of the concepts of intention and intentionality. Then we examine the notion of social agent (i.e., an agent where obligations prevail over intentions) and discuss some computational and philosophical issues related to it. We show that the notion of social agent either requires more complex computations or has some philosophical drawbacks
We are interested in programming languages for cognitive agents with preferences. We define rule-bas...
This article extends Defeasible Logic to deal with the contextual deliberation process of cognitive ...
none4In this paper we show how defeasible logic could formally account for the non-monotonic propert...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
We propose a computationally oriented non-monotonic multi-modal logic arising from the combination o...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
Defeasible Logic is extended to programming languages for cognitive agents with preferences and acti...
Defeasible Logic is extended to programming languages for cognitive agents with preferences and acti...
We are interested in programming languages for cognitive agents with preferences. We define rule-bas...
This article extends Defeasible Logic to deal with the contextual deliberation process of cognitive ...
none4In this paper we show how defeasible logic could formally account for the non-monotonic propert...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
We propose a computationally oriented non-monotonic multi-modal logic arising from the combination o...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
In this paper we follow the BOID (Belief, Obligation, Intention, Desire) architecture to describe ag...
Defeasible Logic is extended to programming languages for cognitive agents with preferences and acti...
Defeasible Logic is extended to programming languages for cognitive agents with preferences and acti...
We are interested in programming languages for cognitive agents with preferences. We define rule-bas...
This article extends Defeasible Logic to deal with the contextual deliberation process of cognitive ...
none4In this paper we show how defeasible logic could formally account for the non-monotonic propert...