<p>A) Elastin: *p = 0.014 compared to respective S group and <sup>#</sup>p = 0.012 compared to respective S group. B) Fibrillin: There was no significant difference in any of PPE groups compared to their respective S groups.</p
<p>Different of upper and lower case letters respectively indicate statistically significant differe...
<p>Average diffusivity indices for two groups of non-lesional OR fibers (<i>p</i> represents statist...
<p>A) Lactate-to-pyruvate ratio in the Albumin perfusion and HES perfusion group, B) wet-to-dry weig...
<p>A) * p = 0.031 compared to the other groups; ** p≤0.001 compared to S groups; B) * p = 0.035 comp...
Similar to the results of Fig 3, significant differences between BP-SES and DP-EES with regard to th...
<p>Comparison between the groups of collagen I, collagen III, Fibrillin-1 and ratio Collagen I/ Coll...
Comparisons of characteristics of fibrosis stages by FIB-4 or transient elastogrpahy.</p
<p>There were no difference between groups in PLT count(A), PT(B), APTT(C), TT(D); The Fibrigen leve...
<p>Comparison of fibroglandular tissue volume obtained from MRI and FFDMs (a) per breast (n = 353) a...
Comparison of laboratory parameters of SFTS patients in the HPE and AP groups.</p
<p>Median volume of fluid received pre- and post-protocol by fluid type (crystalloid vs. blood).</p
<p>There was an increase in PMN density in parenchyma in PPE groups compared to respective Control g...
*<p>p<0.05; ** p<0.01; <sup>A</sup>Mean of ELM release is 17,2 ng/mL for patients having hypercholes...
<p>Volumes of interest (VOI) with number and percentages of statistically significantly different te...
<p>Standard conditions for gel and stromal thickness. This shows effects of differences in epithelia...
<p>Different of upper and lower case letters respectively indicate statistically significant differe...
<p>Average diffusivity indices for two groups of non-lesional OR fibers (<i>p</i> represents statist...
<p>A) Lactate-to-pyruvate ratio in the Albumin perfusion and HES perfusion group, B) wet-to-dry weig...
<p>A) * p = 0.031 compared to the other groups; ** p≤0.001 compared to S groups; B) * p = 0.035 comp...
Similar to the results of Fig 3, significant differences between BP-SES and DP-EES with regard to th...
<p>Comparison between the groups of collagen I, collagen III, Fibrillin-1 and ratio Collagen I/ Coll...
Comparisons of characteristics of fibrosis stages by FIB-4 or transient elastogrpahy.</p
<p>There were no difference between groups in PLT count(A), PT(B), APTT(C), TT(D); The Fibrigen leve...
<p>Comparison of fibroglandular tissue volume obtained from MRI and FFDMs (a) per breast (n = 353) a...
Comparison of laboratory parameters of SFTS patients in the HPE and AP groups.</p
<p>Median volume of fluid received pre- and post-protocol by fluid type (crystalloid vs. blood).</p
<p>There was an increase in PMN density in parenchyma in PPE groups compared to respective Control g...
*<p>p<0.05; ** p<0.01; <sup>A</sup>Mean of ELM release is 17,2 ng/mL for patients having hypercholes...
<p>Volumes of interest (VOI) with number and percentages of statistically significantly different te...
<p>Standard conditions for gel and stromal thickness. This shows effects of differences in epithelia...
<p>Different of upper and lower case letters respectively indicate statistically significant differe...
<p>Average diffusivity indices for two groups of non-lesional OR fibers (<i>p</i> represents statist...
<p>A) Lactate-to-pyruvate ratio in the Albumin perfusion and HES perfusion group, B) wet-to-dry weig...