<p>Comparison results by a jackknife methodology among LIDC and nine other prediction measures in the YMIPS_4546 PIN.</p
<p>Comparison of various prediction methods in terms of the area under the ROC curve (AUC).</p
<p>Comparison of the success rates and <i>MCC</i> values obtained by the current <b>iNR-PhysChem</b>...
<p>Comparison of the number of essential proteins from the top 100–600 identified by LIDC and three ...
<p>Comparison results by ROC curves among LIDC and nine other prediction measures in the YMIPS_4546 ...
<p>The results are in YMIPS_4546 PIN.</p><p>Statistical analyses of improvement according to compari...
<p>Comparison of the jackknife test results between our method and other competing structural class ...
<p>Comparison of the number of essential proteins from the top 100–600 identified by LIDC and nine o...
<p>Comparison of the sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative p...
<p>Performance comparison among various types of sequence features and methods for the within-germli...
<p>Comparison of the success rates and <i>MCC</i> values obtained by the current iNR-PhysChem and NR...
<p>Jackknife tests (%) and the mean feature numbers of the SVM-based predictors for 30 samples.</p
<p>Comparison of the number of essential proteins from the top 100–600 identified by LIDC and nine o...
<p>Comparison of OGN, CoEWC, SON, LBCC, and five common used centrality measures (BC, CC, DC, EC, an...
<p>Results of jackknife test of relative importance of predictor variables for Chinese caterpillar f...
<p>The AUROC comparison of seven feature combinations through Jackknife cross-validation on PDB1075 ...
<p>Comparison of various prediction methods in terms of the area under the ROC curve (AUC).</p
<p>Comparison of the success rates and <i>MCC</i> values obtained by the current <b>iNR-PhysChem</b>...
<p>Comparison of the number of essential proteins from the top 100–600 identified by LIDC and three ...
<p>Comparison results by ROC curves among LIDC and nine other prediction measures in the YMIPS_4546 ...
<p>The results are in YMIPS_4546 PIN.</p><p>Statistical analyses of improvement according to compari...
<p>Comparison of the jackknife test results between our method and other competing structural class ...
<p>Comparison of the number of essential proteins from the top 100–600 identified by LIDC and nine o...
<p>Comparison of the sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative p...
<p>Performance comparison among various types of sequence features and methods for the within-germli...
<p>Comparison of the success rates and <i>MCC</i> values obtained by the current iNR-PhysChem and NR...
<p>Jackknife tests (%) and the mean feature numbers of the SVM-based predictors for 30 samples.</p
<p>Comparison of the number of essential proteins from the top 100–600 identified by LIDC and nine o...
<p>Comparison of OGN, CoEWC, SON, LBCC, and five common used centrality measures (BC, CC, DC, EC, an...
<p>Results of jackknife test of relative importance of predictor variables for Chinese caterpillar f...
<p>The AUROC comparison of seven feature combinations through Jackknife cross-validation on PDB1075 ...
<p>Comparison of various prediction methods in terms of the area under the ROC curve (AUC).</p
<p>Comparison of the success rates and <i>MCC</i> values obtained by the current <b>iNR-PhysChem</b>...
<p>Comparison of the number of essential proteins from the top 100–600 identified by LIDC and three ...
DOI
Add to ORKG