<p>Magnification of internal and external calibration markers and difference of each case in percent.</p
Differences in dimension scores and overall scores among different groups, M (SD).</p
<p>Comparison of accuracy within 30% and within 10% of estimating equations by exact McNemar tests.<...
<div><p>Digital templating with external calibration markers is the standard method for planning tot...
<p>Percentages and case numbers of intraocular lens power in different ranges of the two devices in ...
Numbers and percentages of hit and miss responses for different magnification modes, levels of locat...
<p>Measurement values and differences of the three pairs of reference center points (unit: mm).</p
<p>Spearman correlation coefficients (r) for magnification of internal and external calibration mark...
<p>Percentual differences of the measured volume and mass of the small cylinder, medium-sized and la...
<p>Mean Absolute and Percentage of Difference between the Two Runs for Specimens Originally Classifi...
Digital templating with external calibration markers is the standard method for planning total hip a...
<p>The assessment of methodological quality items shown as percentages across all included studies.<...
<p>Sensitivity analysis showing percentage differences from original number of total cases.</p
<p>Comparison of the estimated PIC values calculated for the two different marker systems, TBP and S...
Digital templating with external calibration markers is the standard method for planning total hip a...
<p>Percentage of common peaks detected by each method included in the comparison and related to each...
Differences in dimension scores and overall scores among different groups, M (SD).</p
<p>Comparison of accuracy within 30% and within 10% of estimating equations by exact McNemar tests.<...
<div><p>Digital templating with external calibration markers is the standard method for planning tot...
<p>Percentages and case numbers of intraocular lens power in different ranges of the two devices in ...
Numbers and percentages of hit and miss responses for different magnification modes, levels of locat...
<p>Measurement values and differences of the three pairs of reference center points (unit: mm).</p
<p>Spearman correlation coefficients (r) for magnification of internal and external calibration mark...
<p>Percentual differences of the measured volume and mass of the small cylinder, medium-sized and la...
<p>Mean Absolute and Percentage of Difference between the Two Runs for Specimens Originally Classifi...
Digital templating with external calibration markers is the standard method for planning total hip a...
<p>The assessment of methodological quality items shown as percentages across all included studies.<...
<p>Sensitivity analysis showing percentage differences from original number of total cases.</p
<p>Comparison of the estimated PIC values calculated for the two different marker systems, TBP and S...
Digital templating with external calibration markers is the standard method for planning total hip a...
<p>Percentage of common peaks detected by each method included in the comparison and related to each...
Differences in dimension scores and overall scores among different groups, M (SD).</p
<p>Comparison of accuracy within 30% and within 10% of estimating equations by exact McNemar tests.<...
<div><p>Digital templating with external calibration markers is the standard method for planning tot...
DOI
Add to ORKG