<p>(A) Strong positive correlation between participants’ full-view and GW accuracies (r[105] = 0.49, <i>p</i> < 0.001) (B) Strong positive correlation between participants’ full-view and MW accuracies (r[28] = 0.67, <i>p</i> < 0.001) (C) No correlation between full-view and RW accuracies (r[32] = 0.18, ns)</p
Tests of accuracy in interpersonal perception take many forms. Often, such tests use designs and sco...
<p>The overall accuracy of the speech emotion detector is 62.58% (95% CI: 61.5%–63.6%) The concordan...
<p><i>Note:</i> NS: No couples of electrodes were selected since there was no main effect among emot...
<p>(A) Strong positive correlation between FV and RME performance (r[139] = 0.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001) ...
<p>Each dot represents the mean value across emotions per subject in HC group (light blue) and PD gr...
A debate has emerged as to whether recognition of emotional stimuli is more accurate or more biased ...
Individual differences in understanding other people’s emotions have typically been studied with rec...
<p>Between-groups comparison of mean (SD) discrimination accuracy of emotional faces (presented for ...
Confidence and its accuracy have been most commonly examined in domains such as general knowledge an...
Pearson correlations (r) between eyes-mouth % difference scsore, correct RT, and accuracy for each e...
Emotional material is commonly assumed to be more accurately recognized than non-emotional material;...
<p>Behavioral results of emotional prosody identification (task 3). Top panel: Correlation between t...
<p>The figure shows the Pearson correlations between the independent variables that were used in the...
<p>When faces are presented for 32 ms, participants are more confident of seeing happy versus sad fa...
Correlation coefficients, across all participant-session combinations for task ‘modulate towards hap...
Tests of accuracy in interpersonal perception take many forms. Often, such tests use designs and sco...
<p>The overall accuracy of the speech emotion detector is 62.58% (95% CI: 61.5%–63.6%) The concordan...
<p><i>Note:</i> NS: No couples of electrodes were selected since there was no main effect among emot...
<p>(A) Strong positive correlation between FV and RME performance (r[139] = 0.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001) ...
<p>Each dot represents the mean value across emotions per subject in HC group (light blue) and PD gr...
A debate has emerged as to whether recognition of emotional stimuli is more accurate or more biased ...
Individual differences in understanding other people’s emotions have typically been studied with rec...
<p>Between-groups comparison of mean (SD) discrimination accuracy of emotional faces (presented for ...
Confidence and its accuracy have been most commonly examined in domains such as general knowledge an...
Pearson correlations (r) between eyes-mouth % difference scsore, correct RT, and accuracy for each e...
Emotional material is commonly assumed to be more accurately recognized than non-emotional material;...
<p>Behavioral results of emotional prosody identification (task 3). Top panel: Correlation between t...
<p>The figure shows the Pearson correlations between the independent variables that were used in the...
<p>When faces are presented for 32 ms, participants are more confident of seeing happy versus sad fa...
Correlation coefficients, across all participant-session combinations for task ‘modulate towards hap...
Tests of accuracy in interpersonal perception take many forms. Often, such tests use designs and sco...
<p>The overall accuracy of the speech emotion detector is 62.58% (95% CI: 61.5%–63.6%) The concordan...
<p><i>Note:</i> NS: No couples of electrodes were selected since there was no main effect among emot...