<p>Top graphs: Resultant COP path, Middle graphs: ML COP path, Bottom graphs: AP COP path.</p
<p>Flow chart of all methods used to produce the agent paths and movement times to calibrate to real...
<p>The horizontal axis represents trials per participant, with participants ordered by age. The vert...
<p>Top graph shows the mean kinematic angle of TD gait and of each consensus-based pattern of the pe...
<p>The time-series graphs of the surface runoff under three simulation scenarios.</p
<p>The time-series graphs of accumulated underground water volume under three simulation scenarios.<...
<p>Hotelling’s <i>T</i><sup>2</sup> trajectory of resultant COP (top graphs) and post hoc scalar <i>...
<p>Graph of the identification times for targets and all types of nontargets across the urban and na...
The graphs show box plots with frames representing the 1st and 3rd quartiles and the median demonstr...
<p>Mean COP Total excursions in the ML direction for all subjects, intervals and measurement session...
(a) Path distribution results of communities at t = 30. (b) Path distribution results of communities...
<p>Representative examples of simulated series of COP position (top) and velocity (bottom).</p
A graph of model performance scores (precision, recall and F1) based on varying MLP depths.</p
<p>TOP: Mean trajectory and variability of thumb path-length for ABL and CTS groups. BOTTOM: Mean tr...
The alphabetic symbols A~D in the figure indicated where the curves differed.</p
<p>Comparison graph of simulation time that used in SBR and MRLMA methods for scenario 1–3.</p
<p>Flow chart of all methods used to produce the agent paths and movement times to calibrate to real...
<p>The horizontal axis represents trials per participant, with participants ordered by age. The vert...
<p>Top graph shows the mean kinematic angle of TD gait and of each consensus-based pattern of the pe...
<p>The time-series graphs of the surface runoff under three simulation scenarios.</p
<p>The time-series graphs of accumulated underground water volume under three simulation scenarios.<...
<p>Hotelling’s <i>T</i><sup>2</sup> trajectory of resultant COP (top graphs) and post hoc scalar <i>...
<p>Graph of the identification times for targets and all types of nontargets across the urban and na...
The graphs show box plots with frames representing the 1st and 3rd quartiles and the median demonstr...
<p>Mean COP Total excursions in the ML direction for all subjects, intervals and measurement session...
(a) Path distribution results of communities at t = 30. (b) Path distribution results of communities...
<p>Representative examples of simulated series of COP position (top) and velocity (bottom).</p
A graph of model performance scores (precision, recall and F1) based on varying MLP depths.</p
<p>TOP: Mean trajectory and variability of thumb path-length for ABL and CTS groups. BOTTOM: Mean tr...
The alphabetic symbols A~D in the figure indicated where the curves differed.</p
<p>Comparison graph of simulation time that used in SBR and MRLMA methods for scenario 1–3.</p
<p>Flow chart of all methods used to produce the agent paths and movement times to calibrate to real...
<p>The horizontal axis represents trials per participant, with participants ordered by age. The vert...
<p>Top graph shows the mean kinematic angle of TD gait and of each consensus-based pattern of the pe...
DOI
Add to ORKG