<p>In the three-chamber social test the proportion of the total time sniffing the novel mouse or an alternative (social or not) can be used as a measure of preference, with a dashed line at 50% indicating a lack of preference. A: All groups showed a strong preference for the social stimulus without any genotype effects; B: All groups showed a strong preference for the novel social stimulus, with no genotype effects. Sniffing was scored manually. Data shown are means ± SEM.</p
<p>* shows a p-value of less than 0.05, † shows p-value of 0.06. A. Mean time (±SEM) displaying all ...
<p>After 5 minutes of acclimatization, male subjects were allowed to explore all chambers for 10 min...
<p>In a sociability test SPF and GF mice were not different in time spent in chamber with a strange ...
<p>A: During the sociability phase the percent time spent in each of the three chambers showed that ...
<p>Right after the sociability assessment, male subjects were allowed to explore all chambers for 10...
<p>Exploration of each stimulus was assessed by measuring the time spent in each contact area, i.e.,...
<p>Social sniffing test demonstrated significant differences at each time points between wild type a...
<p>(A) % time spent sniffing litter scented by stranger mouse versus that from test subject's own ca...
<p>Both wt and tg mice spent more time on a block with other mouse’s scent than the block carrying i...
<p><b>(A)</b> Time spent in each chamber. <b>(B)</b> Approach-avoidance scores. <b>(C)</b> Preferenc...
<p>PPS animals spent comparable time exploring the object, but less time sniffing the juvenile rat a...
<p>(A) exploration time in the sociability phase and (B) exploration time in the social novelty phas...
<p>(A) Time spent sniffing an unfamiliar ovariectomized female (OEF) during the 6-trial social test:...
Abstract Background Deciphering the biological mechanisms underlying social behavior in animal model...
<p>The social interaction (SI) quotient is determined by proportion of time the experimental mouse e...
<p>* shows a p-value of less than 0.05, † shows p-value of 0.06. A. Mean time (±SEM) displaying all ...
<p>After 5 minutes of acclimatization, male subjects were allowed to explore all chambers for 10 min...
<p>In a sociability test SPF and GF mice were not different in time spent in chamber with a strange ...
<p>A: During the sociability phase the percent time spent in each of the three chambers showed that ...
<p>Right after the sociability assessment, male subjects were allowed to explore all chambers for 10...
<p>Exploration of each stimulus was assessed by measuring the time spent in each contact area, i.e.,...
<p>Social sniffing test demonstrated significant differences at each time points between wild type a...
<p>(A) % time spent sniffing litter scented by stranger mouse versus that from test subject's own ca...
<p>Both wt and tg mice spent more time on a block with other mouse’s scent than the block carrying i...
<p><b>(A)</b> Time spent in each chamber. <b>(B)</b> Approach-avoidance scores. <b>(C)</b> Preferenc...
<p>PPS animals spent comparable time exploring the object, but less time sniffing the juvenile rat a...
<p>(A) exploration time in the sociability phase and (B) exploration time in the social novelty phas...
<p>(A) Time spent sniffing an unfamiliar ovariectomized female (OEF) during the 6-trial social test:...
Abstract Background Deciphering the biological mechanisms underlying social behavior in animal model...
<p>The social interaction (SI) quotient is determined by proportion of time the experimental mouse e...
<p>* shows a p-value of less than 0.05, † shows p-value of 0.06. A. Mean time (±SEM) displaying all ...
<p>After 5 minutes of acclimatization, male subjects were allowed to explore all chambers for 10 min...
<p>In a sociability test SPF and GF mice were not different in time spent in chamber with a strange ...