<p>Tomato reference genes were ranked based on expression stability calculated by geNorm. New reference gene candidates are indicated in bold. <i>M</i> values represent the average expression stability of each gene (n = 48). The cut-off value for reliable reference genes is indicated by a dashed line.</p
<p>Average expression stability values (M) of reference genes were measured during stepwise exclusio...
<p>Genes on the x-axis in order of increasing stability (y-axis M value) for (A) all samples, (B) dr...
<p>Genes with M value ≤ 1.5 are considered highly stable across analyzed samples [<a href="http://ww...
<p>Average expression stabilities (M) of the candidate reference genes in (A) flower buds (25 genes)...
<p>Stability value of each reference gene was evaluated from four sample subsets: (A) scion leaves o...
<p>Gene expression stability (M value–y-axis) is shown for the candidate reference genes (x-axis) fr...
<p>The cutoff for reference gene stability was proposed to be an M value of 0.5. Candidate reference...
“1”<p>: PGR subset, plant growth regulator treatment subset;</p>“2”<p>: M, stability measure;</p>“*”...
<p>Notes: LP, leaf-expansion period; FS, the flower stage; GFS, the green fruit stage; RFS, the red ...
<p>Expression stability and ranking of 11 reference genes calculated with geNorm in all the samples ...
P>The quantification of messenger RNA expression levels by real-time reverse-transcription polyme...
<p>Ranking of gene expression stability was performed in all the samples, in abiotic stress samples,...
P>The quantification of messenger RNA expression levels by real-time reverse-transcription polyme...
<p>(A) All 29 samples, (B) different organs, (C) leaves in different developmental processes, (D) sc...
<p>The genes are ranked according to their expression stability; the least stable genes are on the l...
<p>Average expression stability values (M) of reference genes were measured during stepwise exclusio...
<p>Genes on the x-axis in order of increasing stability (y-axis M value) for (A) all samples, (B) dr...
<p>Genes with M value ≤ 1.5 are considered highly stable across analyzed samples [<a href="http://ww...
<p>Average expression stabilities (M) of the candidate reference genes in (A) flower buds (25 genes)...
<p>Stability value of each reference gene was evaluated from four sample subsets: (A) scion leaves o...
<p>Gene expression stability (M value–y-axis) is shown for the candidate reference genes (x-axis) fr...
<p>The cutoff for reference gene stability was proposed to be an M value of 0.5. Candidate reference...
“1”<p>: PGR subset, plant growth regulator treatment subset;</p>“2”<p>: M, stability measure;</p>“*”...
<p>Notes: LP, leaf-expansion period; FS, the flower stage; GFS, the green fruit stage; RFS, the red ...
<p>Expression stability and ranking of 11 reference genes calculated with geNorm in all the samples ...
P>The quantification of messenger RNA expression levels by real-time reverse-transcription polyme...
<p>Ranking of gene expression stability was performed in all the samples, in abiotic stress samples,...
P>The quantification of messenger RNA expression levels by real-time reverse-transcription polyme...
<p>(A) All 29 samples, (B) different organs, (C) leaves in different developmental processes, (D) sc...
<p>The genes are ranked according to their expression stability; the least stable genes are on the l...
<p>Average expression stability values (M) of reference genes were measured during stepwise exclusio...
<p>Genes on the x-axis in order of increasing stability (y-axis M value) for (A) all samples, (B) dr...
<p>Genes with M value ≤ 1.5 are considered highly stable across analyzed samples [<a href="http://ww...