<p>The bootstrap values were based on 1,000 replicates, the scale bar represents 10% sequence divergence, and only >50% values are shown. In brackets, the numbers preceding the slash represent the number of clones belong to the OTU, and the numbers following the slash represent the total number of clones in corresponding clone libraries.</p
<p>Reference sequences from GenBank showcased in bold. OTUs were defined by using a distance level o...
<p>The numbers of the sequences in this tree refer to the numbers in the DGGE. The scale bar represe...
<p>The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes–Cantor method. Bootstrap values (over 50...
<p>The bootstrap values were based on 1,000 replicates, the <i>scale bar</i> represents 2% sequence ...
<p>The numbers at the nodes are percentages that indicate the levels of bootstrap support from 1000 ...
<p>The numbers at the nodes are percentages that indicate the levels of bootstrap support from 1,000...
<p>Following the name of each OTU, the name of the sample and the percentage of this OTU was indicat...
<p>Reference sequences from GenBank are shown in bold. OTUs were defined by using a distance level o...
<p>Following the name of each OTU, the name of the sample and the percentage of this OTU was indicat...
<p>The numbers on the branches are bootstrap values obtained from 1000 bootstrap replicates.</p
<p>The numbers at the nodes are percentages indicating the levels of bootstrap support based on a ne...
<p>The tree was constructed by the Neighbor-Joining method using partial sequences of 16S rRNA gene....
<p>The predominant groups which were just denoted the phylogenetic positions in this tree, presented...
<p>Sequences obtained in this study were written in bold and colors, which represent different clone...
<p>Phylogenetic tree based on analysis of the representative 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from t...
<p>Reference sequences from GenBank showcased in bold. OTUs were defined by using a distance level o...
<p>The numbers of the sequences in this tree refer to the numbers in the DGGE. The scale bar represe...
<p>The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes–Cantor method. Bootstrap values (over 50...
<p>The bootstrap values were based on 1,000 replicates, the <i>scale bar</i> represents 2% sequence ...
<p>The numbers at the nodes are percentages that indicate the levels of bootstrap support from 1000 ...
<p>The numbers at the nodes are percentages that indicate the levels of bootstrap support from 1,000...
<p>Following the name of each OTU, the name of the sample and the percentage of this OTU was indicat...
<p>Reference sequences from GenBank are shown in bold. OTUs were defined by using a distance level o...
<p>Following the name of each OTU, the name of the sample and the percentage of this OTU was indicat...
<p>The numbers on the branches are bootstrap values obtained from 1000 bootstrap replicates.</p
<p>The numbers at the nodes are percentages indicating the levels of bootstrap support based on a ne...
<p>The tree was constructed by the Neighbor-Joining method using partial sequences of 16S rRNA gene....
<p>The predominant groups which were just denoted the phylogenetic positions in this tree, presented...
<p>Sequences obtained in this study were written in bold and colors, which represent different clone...
<p>Phylogenetic tree based on analysis of the representative 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained from t...
<p>Reference sequences from GenBank showcased in bold. OTUs were defined by using a distance level o...
<p>The numbers of the sequences in this tree refer to the numbers in the DGGE. The scale bar represe...
<p>The evolutionary distances were computed using the Jukes–Cantor method. Bootstrap values (over 50...