<p><b>(a)</b> The PT-based experiment used two “gambles”, schematized by two spinners. One spinner showed two-thirds of its area as gains (+$10) and one-third as losses (-$8), leading to an expected outcome (i.e., referred to as actuarial outcome in Breiter et al. [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0135216#pone.0135216.ref038" target="_blank">38</a>]) of +$4. The second spinner showed one-thirds of its area as gains (+$10) and two-thirds as losses (-$8), leading to an expected outcome of-$2. Each trial lasted 20 seconds, with 10s focused on the arrow spinning (anticipation phase) and 10s focused on the arrow stopping, and the win/loss flickering (outcome phase). Order of presentation between the PT-based ...
<p>During this experiment, a separate group of naive subjects performed a speeded semantic categoriz...
<p>The four panels correspond to four ROIs that were defined in V1 by the respective conditions. To ...
<p>A: The relationship between the aftereffects that were predicted by the linear integration model ...
<p>(a): Results of the first experiment. The horizontal and vertical axes denote the set number and ...
<p>A: Average hand path from one representative subject following step torques and ramp-down torques...
<p>(<b>A</b>) The timeline of the sequential-sampling task used in Experiment 1. After fixation, two...
<p>A. Stimuli consisted of four disconnected bars arranged in a square shape whose contrast was modu...
Experimental setup (A). Subject is holding a handle of the Haptic Master covered with a screen. Top ...
<p>(A) Temporal response function (TRF) results for Experiment 2 (75% cue validity). Left: grand ave...
<p>(a) The percentage optimality is depicted for various subject categories as obtained from the exp...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Bird's eye view of the viewing geometry of the stimulus presentation. Top row: simulat...
<p>A: Overhead representation of a participant performing the task. The hand aligned cursor (white d...
<p>Representation of the experimental setup (a) and the predictions that are made for reaction time ...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Two trials of a single participant (P8) for one object orientation (blue and red lines...
<p>The highlighted circles denote instances of the response selected for receiving an outcome. The i...
<p>During this experiment, a separate group of naive subjects performed a speeded semantic categoriz...
<p>The four panels correspond to four ROIs that were defined in V1 by the respective conditions. To ...
<p>A: The relationship between the aftereffects that were predicted by the linear integration model ...
<p>(a): Results of the first experiment. The horizontal and vertical axes denote the set number and ...
<p>A: Average hand path from one representative subject following step torques and ramp-down torques...
<p>(<b>A</b>) The timeline of the sequential-sampling task used in Experiment 1. After fixation, two...
<p>A. Stimuli consisted of four disconnected bars arranged in a square shape whose contrast was modu...
Experimental setup (A). Subject is holding a handle of the Haptic Master covered with a screen. Top ...
<p>(A) Temporal response function (TRF) results for Experiment 2 (75% cue validity). Left: grand ave...
<p>(a) The percentage optimality is depicted for various subject categories as obtained from the exp...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Bird's eye view of the viewing geometry of the stimulus presentation. Top row: simulat...
<p>A: Overhead representation of a participant performing the task. The hand aligned cursor (white d...
<p>Representation of the experimental setup (a) and the predictions that are made for reaction time ...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Two trials of a single participant (P8) for one object orientation (blue and red lines...
<p>The highlighted circles denote instances of the response selected for receiving an outcome. The i...
<p>During this experiment, a separate group of naive subjects performed a speeded semantic categoriz...
<p>The four panels correspond to four ROIs that were defined in V1 by the respective conditions. To ...
<p>A: The relationship between the aftereffects that were predicted by the linear integration model ...