Ask
Search
My library
ORKG

ORKG Ask

Our mission is to organize scholarly knowledge and make it accessible to humans and machines.

About

About ORKG Ask
Report issue
Statistics
Contact

Legal

Terms of use
Data protection (sheet)
Imprint
Accessibility
License

Technical

We
open source
System status
Changelog
Frontend: v1.41.0
Backend: v1.13.4

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

Results of post-procedural occlusion and occlusion at six months.

Teng-Fei Li (686000)
Shao-Feng Shui (802505)
Xin-Wei Han (780278)
Lei Yan (69509)
Ji Ma (330962)
Dong Guo (442625)
Hong-Can Zhu (802506)
Shu-Kai Wang (802507)
Yuan-Hong He (802508)
Wen-Wu Chen (802509)
Li-Ping Wei (802510)
Ming-Ke Wang (802511)
Tai-Min Song (802512)

Publication date

October 2015

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0139714.t002

Abstract

<p>*28 patients were lost to follow up at six months.</p><p>Results of post-procedural occlusion and occlusion at six months.</p

Extracted data

Related items

Clinical outcome and time to recompression in the delayed treatment group.

Amir Hadanny (5663077)
Gregori Fishlev (102919)
Yair Bechor (102921)
Jacob Bergan (102923)
Mony Friedman (102927)
Amit Maliar (729197)
Shai Efrati (102916)

April 2015

<p>* Treatment after 48, 72 and 96 hours from surfacing showed no significant differences in clinica...

Efficacy outcomes in the coil treated patients 90, 180 and 360 days post final treatment.

Zaid Zoumot (718834)
Samuel V. Kemp (718835)
Suveer Singh (640912)
Stephen R. Bicknell (718836)
William H. McNulty (718837)
Nicholas S. Hopkinson (156975)
Ewen T. Ross (718838)
Pallav L. Shah (640910)

April 2015

<p>Efficacy outcomes in the coil treated patients 90, 180 and 360 days post final treatment.</p

For the purpose of assessing clinical improvements, follow up times were grouped into time periods of 3–6 months, 7–9 months, 10–13 months and greater than 13 months.

Peng Zhang (2071)
Yang Zou (102732)
Feng-Xia Yu (6204305)
Zheng Wang (25883)
Han Lv (537263)
Xue-Huan Liu (6204308)
He-Yu Ding (6204311)
Ting-Ting Zhang (1477306)
Peng-Fei Zhao (2310979)
Hong-Xia Yin (6204314)
Zheng-Han Yang (6204317)
Zhen-Chang Wang (3219696)

January 2019

Most of the patients experienced an improving trend in clinical symptoms within 9 months after the f...

Procedural and follow-up clinical outcomes after chronic total occlusion revascularization: Data from an Indian public hospital

Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai
Sakthivel Ramasamy
Kabilan S. Jagadheesan
Santhosh Satheesh
Raja J. Selvaraj
Balachander Jayaraman

January 2019

Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) continues to be challenging lesion subset for percutaneous...

Lieke M. C. Gijezen (575098)
Marigje Vernooij (575099)
Herm Martens (575100)
Charlene E. U. Oduber (575101)
Charles J. M. Henquet (575102)
Theo M. Starink (575103)
Martin H. Prins (112726)
Fred H. Menko (280985)
Patty J. Nelemans (134239)
Maurice A. M. van Steensel (110730)

June 2014

<p>* The patient who was lost to follow-up at 3 months was excluded from the analysis of the 3 month...

Occlusion comparison of experiment groups before and after the treatment.

Chufeng Liu (341522)
Yang Cao (53545)
Conghua Liu (341523)
Jincai Zhang (341525)
Pingping Xu (291288)

February 2013

<p>(a, b) before the treatment. (c, d) after the treatment. Occlusal views show that the upper incis...

Clinical Investigation Incidence and Consequences of Periprocedural Occlusion

September 2016

Registry, 122 (6.8%) had periprocedural occlusion (4.9%o in the catheterization laboratory, 1.9%o ou...

Finishing occlusion, degree of stahility and the PAR index

Woods Michael
Lee Doug
Crawford Edward

March 2000

The occlusions of sixty -five patients, treated by one private specialist orthodontist with consiste...

Comparison of the literature of the reinfection rates (RR) after 2-stage procedures.

Irene Katharina Sigmund (5485262)
Jutta Gamper (4459168)
Christine Weber (767476)
Johannes Holinka (2636257)
Joannis Panotopoulos (782885)
Philipp Theodor Funovics (5485265)
Reinhard Windhager (310422)

July 2018

<p>The follow-up period started after the first revision (m = months). In the series of Flint et al....

Scatter plot of catheter-resistance monitoring results.

Joshua Wolf (790379)
Li Tang (179703)
Jeffrey E. Rubnitz (790380)
Rachel C. Brennan (790381)
David R. Shook (790382)
Dennis C. Stokes (740214)
Paul Monagle (300415)
Nigel Curtis (150095)
Leon J. Worth (790383)
Kim Allison (790384)
Yilun Sun (757143)
Patricia M. Flynn (705085)

August 2015

<p>Results are stratified by whether a clinical occlusion occurred within 10 days. The changes in re...

Temporal trends in chronic total occlusion interventions in Europe: 17626 procedures from the European Registry of Chronic total occlusion

Konstantinidis N. V.
Werner G. S.
Deftereos S.
Di Mario C.
Galassi A. R.
Buettner J. H.
Avran A.
Reifart N.
Goktekin O.
Garbo R.
Bufe A.
Mashayekhi K.
Boudou N.
Meyer-Gessner M.
Lauer B.
Elhadad S.
Christiansen E. H.
Escaned J.
Hildick-Smith D.
Carlino M.
Louvard Y.
Lefevre T.
Angelis L.
Giannopoulos G.
Sianos G.

January 2018

BACKGROUND: The study focuses on the evolution of practice, procedural outcomes, and in-hospital com...

Loss to Follow-up: A Deceptive Enigma

Sandeep Patel
Vishal Kumar
Shahnawaz Khan
Amit Salaria

April 2021

Loss to follow-up indicates both patients not reporting and inability to trace them during the requi...

Immediate results and one-year clinical outcome after percutaneouscoronary interventions in chronic total occlusions: data from a multicenter,prospective, observational study (TOAST-GISE).

Olivari Z
Rubartelli P
Ettori F
Fontanelli A
Salemme L
Giachero C
Di Mario C
Gabrielli G
Spedicato L
Bedogni F
TOAST GISE Investigators
PISCIONE, Federico

January 2003

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the success rate and the acute and 12-month clinical outcome...

Follow-up routines for occlusal appliances in public dental practice in Västerbotten, Sweden

Daniel, Terblanche
Mikael, Trinh

January 2022

Background: Occlusal appliances for treatment of different temporomandibular disorders (TMD) have sh...

Marie Pirotta
Carolyn Ee
Helena Teede
Patty Chondro

August 2016

After the publication of this work [1], it was brought to our attention that the time for patient fo...

Clinical outcome and time to recompression in the delayed treatment group.

Amir Hadanny (5663077)
Gregori Fishlev (102919)
Yair Bechor (102921)
Jacob Bergan (102923)
Mony Friedman (102927)
Amit Maliar (729197)
Shai Efrati (102916)

April 2015

<p>* Treatment after 48, 72 and 96 hours from surfacing showed no significant differences in clinica...

Efficacy outcomes in the coil treated patients 90, 180 and 360 days post final treatment.

Zaid Zoumot (718834)
Samuel V. Kemp (718835)
Suveer Singh (640912)
Stephen R. Bicknell (718836)
William H. McNulty (718837)
Nicholas S. Hopkinson (156975)
Ewen T. Ross (718838)
Pallav L. Shah (640910)

April 2015

<p>Efficacy outcomes in the coil treated patients 90, 180 and 360 days post final treatment.</p

For the purpose of assessing clinical improvements, follow up times were grouped into time periods of 3–6 months, 7–9 months, 10–13 months and greater than 13 months.

Peng Zhang (2071)
Yang Zou (102732)
Feng-Xia Yu (6204305)
Zheng Wang (25883)
Han Lv (537263)
Xue-Huan Liu (6204308)
He-Yu Ding (6204311)
Ting-Ting Zhang (1477306)
Peng-Fei Zhao (2310979)
Hong-Xia Yin (6204314)
Zheng-Han Yang (6204317)
Zhen-Chang Wang (3219696)

January 2019

Most of the patients experienced an improving trend in clinical symptoms within 9 months after the f...

Procedural and follow-up clinical outcomes after chronic total occlusion revascularization: Data from an Indian public hospital

Ajith Ananthakrishna Pillai
Sakthivel Ramasamy
Kabilan S. Jagadheesan
Santhosh Satheesh
Raja J. Selvaraj
Balachander Jayaraman

January 2019

Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) continues to be challenging lesion subset for percutaneous...

Lieke M. C. Gijezen (575098)
Marigje Vernooij (575099)
Herm Martens (575100)
Charlene E. U. Oduber (575101)
Charles J. M. Henquet (575102)
Theo M. Starink (575103)
Martin H. Prins (112726)
Fred H. Menko (280985)
Patty J. Nelemans (134239)
Maurice A. M. van Steensel (110730)

June 2014

<p>* The patient who was lost to follow-up at 3 months was excluded from the analysis of the 3 month...

Occlusion comparison of experiment groups before and after the treatment.

Chufeng Liu (341522)
Yang Cao (53545)
Conghua Liu (341523)
Jincai Zhang (341525)
Pingping Xu (291288)

February 2013

<p>(a, b) before the treatment. (c, d) after the treatment. Occlusal views show that the upper incis...

Clinical Investigation Incidence and Consequences of Periprocedural Occlusion

September 2016

Registry, 122 (6.8%) had periprocedural occlusion (4.9%o in the catheterization laboratory, 1.9%o ou...

Finishing occlusion, degree of stahility and the PAR index

Woods Michael
Lee Doug
Crawford Edward

March 2000

The occlusions of sixty -five patients, treated by one private specialist orthodontist with consiste...

Comparison of the literature of the reinfection rates (RR) after 2-stage procedures.

Irene Katharina Sigmund (5485262)
Jutta Gamper (4459168)
Christine Weber (767476)
Johannes Holinka (2636257)
Joannis Panotopoulos (782885)
Philipp Theodor Funovics (5485265)
Reinhard Windhager (310422)

July 2018

<p>The follow-up period started after the first revision (m = months). In the series of Flint et al....

Scatter plot of catheter-resistance monitoring results.

Joshua Wolf (790379)
Li Tang (179703)
Jeffrey E. Rubnitz (790380)
Rachel C. Brennan (790381)
David R. Shook (790382)
Dennis C. Stokes (740214)
Paul Monagle (300415)
Nigel Curtis (150095)
Leon J. Worth (790383)
Kim Allison (790384)
Yilun Sun (757143)
Patricia M. Flynn (705085)

August 2015

<p>Results are stratified by whether a clinical occlusion occurred within 10 days. The changes in re...

Temporal trends in chronic total occlusion interventions in Europe: 17626 procedures from the European Registry of Chronic total occlusion

Konstantinidis N. V.
Werner G. S.
Deftereos S.
Di Mario C.
Galassi A. R.
Buettner J. H.
Avran A.
Reifart N.
Goktekin O.
Garbo R.
Bufe A.
Mashayekhi K.
Boudou N.
Meyer-Gessner M.
Lauer B.
Elhadad S.
Christiansen E. H.
Escaned J.
Hildick-Smith D.
Carlino M.
Louvard Y.
Lefevre T.
Angelis L.
Giannopoulos G.
Sianos G.

January 2018

BACKGROUND: The study focuses on the evolution of practice, procedural outcomes, and in-hospital com...

Loss to Follow-up: A Deceptive Enigma

Sandeep Patel
Vishal Kumar
Shahnawaz Khan
Amit Salaria

April 2021

Loss to follow-up indicates both patients not reporting and inability to trace them during the requi...

Immediate results and one-year clinical outcome after percutaneouscoronary interventions in chronic total occlusions: data from a multicenter,prospective, observational study (TOAST-GISE).

Olivari Z
Rubartelli P
Ettori F
Fontanelli A
Salemme L
Giachero C
Di Mario C
Gabrielli G
Spedicato L
Bedogni F
TOAST GISE Investigators
PISCIONE, Federico

January 2003

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate the success rate and the acute and 12-month clinical outcome...

Follow-up routines for occlusal appliances in public dental practice in Västerbotten, Sweden

Daniel, Terblanche
Mikael, Trinh

January 2022

Background: Occlusal appliances for treatment of different temporomandibular disorders (TMD) have sh...

Marie Pirotta
Carolyn Ee
Helena Teede
Patty Chondro

August 2016

After the publication of this work [1], it was brought to our attention that the time for patient fo...

Clinical outcome and time to recompression in the delayed treatment group.

Amir Hadanny (5663077)
Gregori Fishlev (102919)
Yair Bechor (102921)
Jacob Bergan (102923)
Mony Friedman (102927)
Amit Maliar (729197)
Shai Efrati (102916)

April 2015

<p>* Treatment after 48, 72 and 96 hours from surfacing showed no significant differences in clinica...

Efficacy outcomes in the coil treated patients 90, 180 and 360 days post final treatment.

Zaid Zoumot (718834)
Samuel V. Kemp (718835)
Suveer Singh (640912)
Stephen R. Bicknell (718836)
William H. McNulty (718837)
Nicholas S. Hopkinson (156975)
Ewen T. Ross (718838)
Pallav L. Shah (640910)

April 2015

<p>Efficacy outcomes in the coil treated patients 90, 180 and 360 days post final treatment.</p

For the purpose of assessing clinical improvements, follow up times were grouped into time periods of 3–6 months, 7–9 months, 10–13 months and greater than 13 months.

Peng Zhang (2071)
Yang Zou (102732)
Feng-Xia Yu (6204305)
Zheng Wang (25883)
Han Lv (537263)
Xue-Huan Liu (6204308)
He-Yu Ding (6204311)
Ting-Ting Zhang (1477306)
Peng-Fei Zhao (2310979)
Hong-Xia Yin (6204314)
Zheng-Han Yang (6204317)
Zhen-Chang Wang (3219696)

January 2019

Most of the patients experienced an improving trend in clinical symptoms within 9 months after the f...