<p>System throughput performance (a)-(c) when there are 10 users/km and (d)-(f) when there are 15 users/km.</p
The total run time performance per hours of the two pipelines for each sample.</p
Simulation results of global throughput performance; Q = 2048 (Q = 11 for ISO18000-6C).</p
<p>Performance comparison of population initialization algorithm for PSODS-RBFNN.</p
When the number of APs whose performance was collected was (a) 2 (i.e., unsaturated learning) and (b...
<p>The simulation is based on two conditions, 25%–75% condition and 10%–90% condition, respectively....
<p>Different user distributions with 10 users/km (i.e., 400 users in the entire simulation area).</p
Simulation results of global throughput performance; Q = 512 (Q = 9 for ISO18000-6C).</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
Simulation results of global throughput performance; Q = 1024 (Q = 10 for ISO18000-6C).</p
Performance statistics of the tested algorithms at different activity levels.</p
<p>The performances of the different classification algorithms as a function of the number of trials...
<p>Relative performance (in %) of our adapted algorithms with respect to their baseline.</p
<p>(a) Average revenues of unit resource with different numbers of Application 1. (b) Average revenu...
Population size = 100 and Generation = 300. (a) Range, (b) Average Tolerance, (c) Average Hamming Di...
<p>Performance comparison among P2P,DCRLS and MobiCrowd with r = 100,200,300.</p
The total run time performance per hours of the two pipelines for each sample.</p
Simulation results of global throughput performance; Q = 2048 (Q = 11 for ISO18000-6C).</p
<p>Performance comparison of population initialization algorithm for PSODS-RBFNN.</p
When the number of APs whose performance was collected was (a) 2 (i.e., unsaturated learning) and (b...
<p>The simulation is based on two conditions, 25%–75% condition and 10%–90% condition, respectively....
<p>Different user distributions with 10 users/km (i.e., 400 users in the entire simulation area).</p
Simulation results of global throughput performance; Q = 512 (Q = 9 for ISO18000-6C).</p
Comparing performance of the proposed methods built with different number of individual models.</p
Simulation results of global throughput performance; Q = 1024 (Q = 10 for ISO18000-6C).</p
Performance statistics of the tested algorithms at different activity levels.</p
<p>The performances of the different classification algorithms as a function of the number of trials...
<p>Relative performance (in %) of our adapted algorithms with respect to their baseline.</p
<p>(a) Average revenues of unit resource with different numbers of Application 1. (b) Average revenu...
Population size = 100 and Generation = 300. (a) Range, (b) Average Tolerance, (c) Average Hamming Di...
<p>Performance comparison among P2P,DCRLS and MobiCrowd with r = 100,200,300.</p
The total run time performance per hours of the two pipelines for each sample.</p
Simulation results of global throughput performance; Q = 2048 (Q = 11 for ISO18000-6C).</p
<p>Performance comparison of population initialization algorithm for PSODS-RBFNN.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG