<p>Village effect variance 0.3 (0.03, 2.5)</p><p>Logistic regression results for risk of households having either <i>Brucella</i> seropositive animals or humans.</p
<p>*Income categories are described in <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/jou...
<p>Multivariable logistic regression model for brucellosis sero-prevalence and associated herd manag...
<p>All models also include pack identity as a random effect. For risk factors measured as continuous...
<p>Household effect variance 1.8 (1.1, 2.8)</p><p>Mixed effects logistic regression results for risk...
<p>eOR, exposure odds ratio; Ref, reference categories; CI, confidence interval.</p><p>Multivariable...
Univariable Firth’s Bias-Reduced Logistic Regression analysis of risk factors associated with human ...
<p>Point estimates (♦) and upper (-) and lower (-) 95% CI of prevalence of households with evidence ...
<p><sup><b>#</b></sup>Adjusted for: Is male, Age, Number of people in house, County (dummy variables...
<p>Results of multivariable logistic regression analysis investigating potential predictors to knowl...
<p>OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference group; SE, Standard error; DE, Degrees of...
Univariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for unfavourable prognosis of brucellosis ca...
<p>Household effect variance 0.6 (0.3, 1.2), Village effect variance 0.1 (0.02, 0.5)</p><p>Mixed-eff...
Risk factors for unfavourable prognosis of brucellosis cases, identified by multivariate logistic re...
<p><sup><b>#</b></sup>Adjusted for: Is male, Age, Number of people in house, County (dummy variables...
<p>eOR, exposure odds ratio; Ref, reference categories; CI, confidence interval, PPE, personal prote...
<p>*Income categories are described in <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/jou...
<p>Multivariable logistic regression model for brucellosis sero-prevalence and associated herd manag...
<p>All models also include pack identity as a random effect. For risk factors measured as continuous...
<p>Household effect variance 1.8 (1.1, 2.8)</p><p>Mixed effects logistic regression results for risk...
<p>eOR, exposure odds ratio; Ref, reference categories; CI, confidence interval.</p><p>Multivariable...
Univariable Firth’s Bias-Reduced Logistic Regression analysis of risk factors associated with human ...
<p>Point estimates (♦) and upper (-) and lower (-) 95% CI of prevalence of households with evidence ...
<p><sup><b>#</b></sup>Adjusted for: Is male, Age, Number of people in house, County (dummy variables...
<p>Results of multivariable logistic regression analysis investigating potential predictors to knowl...
<p>OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference group; SE, Standard error; DE, Degrees of...
Univariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors for unfavourable prognosis of brucellosis ca...
<p>Household effect variance 0.6 (0.3, 1.2), Village effect variance 0.1 (0.02, 0.5)</p><p>Mixed-eff...
Risk factors for unfavourable prognosis of brucellosis cases, identified by multivariate logistic re...
<p><sup><b>#</b></sup>Adjusted for: Is male, Age, Number of people in house, County (dummy variables...
<p>eOR, exposure odds ratio; Ref, reference categories; CI, confidence interval, PPE, personal prote...
<p>*Income categories are described in <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/jou...
<p>Multivariable logistic regression model for brucellosis sero-prevalence and associated herd manag...
<p>All models also include pack identity as a random effect. For risk factors measured as continuous...