<p>(A) Cluster activations for face>house (red) and house>face (blue) contrasts collapsed across response conditions. (B) Clusters positively correlated with drift rates estimated for each subject across difficulty levels. Green indicates overlap of clusters. All contrasts were thresholded at Z>2.3 with whole-brain correction for multiple comparisons at p<0.05.</p
<p>Please note that only clusters surviving the extent threshold of 22 voxels are reported, as revea...
<p>All activations are significant at p<0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster leve...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Cluster activations for hard>easy (A) and easy>hard (B) contrasts for reaction time (RT) (blue) a...
<p>(A) Brain areas showing stronger activation for the one back task on color-pairs compared to pass...
a<p>Coordinates of the maximal point of activation within clusters, k = cluster size.</p><p>Correla...
<p>From left to right, columns represent the label for each area as used throughout the paper, the M...
<p>table shows 3 local maxima more than 8.0 mm apart.</p><p>Height threshold: T = 3.2, p = 0.005 (1....
Clusters that showed significantly increased PPI connectivity for the contrast of [emotion matching ...
<p>b) Activations for the between-subjects contrast <i>no-threat > self-threat</i> (negative feedbac...
<p>(a) Mask generated from statistical analysis of <i>set level</i> contrast across young and older ...
<p>Results of the spatiotemporal cluster analysis on the cortical current estimates data for Face an...
<p>****indicates P<0.0001;</p><p>***indicates P<0.001;</p><p>**indicates P<0.01;</p><p>*ind...
<p>Activation maps indicate regions where the response was higher for: A) unfamiliar faces than hous...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR-corrected at the cluster level. Note: * p<0.005 and cluster...
<p>Please note that only clusters surviving the extent threshold of 22 voxels are reported, as revea...
<p>All activations are significant at p<0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster leve...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....
<p>Cluster activations for hard>easy (A) and easy>hard (B) contrasts for reaction time (RT) (blue) a...
<p>(A) Brain areas showing stronger activation for the one back task on color-pairs compared to pass...
a<p>Coordinates of the maximal point of activation within clusters, k = cluster size.</p><p>Correla...
<p>From left to right, columns represent the label for each area as used throughout the paper, the M...
<p>table shows 3 local maxima more than 8.0 mm apart.</p><p>Height threshold: T = 3.2, p = 0.005 (1....
Clusters that showed significantly increased PPI connectivity for the contrast of [emotion matching ...
<p>b) Activations for the between-subjects contrast <i>no-threat > self-threat</i> (negative feedbac...
<p>(a) Mask generated from statistical analysis of <i>set level</i> contrast across young and older ...
<p>Results of the spatiotemporal cluster analysis on the cortical current estimates data for Face an...
<p>****indicates P<0.0001;</p><p>***indicates P<0.001;</p><p>**indicates P<0.01;</p><p>*ind...
<p>Activation maps indicate regions where the response was higher for: A) unfamiliar faces than hous...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR-corrected at the cluster level. Note: * p<0.005 and cluster...
<p>Please note that only clusters surviving the extent threshold of 22 voxels are reported, as revea...
<p>All activations are significant at p<0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster leve...
<p>Clusters were considered significant at a voxel height of p < .001 and cluster corrected at p < ....