<p>Best results are marked in bold.</p><p>* Window size = 21, <i>C</i> = 2.0 and <i>γ</i> = 0.0078125.</p><p>Performane comparison among DisPredict, SPINE-D and MFDp on independent DD73 dataset.</p
<p>Comparison of classification performance (20 runs of 10-fold cross-validation) on 40 UCI datasets...
Performance comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods on the Caltech-256 datas...
<p>Performance comparisons between three different models using breast cancer datasets.</p
<p><sup>1</sup> 5-fold cross validation performance of MFDp on MxD dataset of 514 protein chains [<a...
<p>First row show the name of dataset and second row show the name of methods.</p><p>Comparison of p...
<p>First row show the name of dataset and second row show the name of methods.</p><p>Comparison of p...
<p>Performance comparison among P2P,DCRLS and MobiCrowd with r = 100,200,300.</p
Performance comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods on the Wang-B dataset.</...
Performance comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods on the Wang-A dataset (v...
<p>Performance comparison of the best DCBS and TTB systems with the different feature sets.</p
Performance comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods on the Wang 10k dataset....
<p>(For MLPD, all the available data are used. For SLPD, only the MRI features are used. The best va...
<p>Performance comparison with other methods on the DDI Extraction 2011 challenge task dataset.</p
<p>Overall performance comparison against each classifier for Drebin Dataset.</p
Comparison of the performance of the four methods under the four distributions data.</p
<p>Comparison of classification performance (20 runs of 10-fold cross-validation) on 40 UCI datasets...
Performance comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods on the Caltech-256 datas...
<p>Performance comparisons between three different models using breast cancer datasets.</p
<p><sup>1</sup> 5-fold cross validation performance of MFDp on MxD dataset of 514 protein chains [<a...
<p>First row show the name of dataset and second row show the name of methods.</p><p>Comparison of p...
<p>First row show the name of dataset and second row show the name of methods.</p><p>Comparison of p...
<p>Performance comparison among P2P,DCRLS and MobiCrowd with r = 100,200,300.</p
Performance comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods on the Wang-B dataset.</...
Performance comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods on the Wang-A dataset (v...
<p>Performance comparison of the best DCBS and TTB systems with the different feature sets.</p
Performance comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods on the Wang 10k dataset....
<p>(For MLPD, all the available data are used. For SLPD, only the MRI features are used. The best va...
<p>Performance comparison with other methods on the DDI Extraction 2011 challenge task dataset.</p
<p>Overall performance comparison against each classifier for Drebin Dataset.</p
Comparison of the performance of the four methods under the four distributions data.</p
<p>Comparison of classification performance (20 runs of 10-fold cross-validation) on 40 UCI datasets...
Performance comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods on the Caltech-256 datas...
<p>Performance comparisons between three different models using breast cancer datasets.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG