<p>The reported clusters were thresholded at the same <i>p</i> < 0.001 (uncorrected for multiple comparisons). <i>Q</i><sub>FDR</sub> indicates the level of FDR on clusters.</p
<p>All activations are significant at p<0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster leve...
<p>Cluster sizes of commonly activated brain regions under the N-back task conditions in the control...
<p>Brain regions showing stronger activation in normal-weight versus morbidly obese subjects in inhi...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR corrected at cluster level.</p><p>Brain regions showing inc...
<p>Brain regions showing stronger responses during inhibition minus passive viewing condition (A), i...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR corrected at cluster level.</p><p>Brain regions showing inc...
<p>(FDR <0.05 combined with cluster level corrected, FWE <0.05).</p><p>Notes: x, y, z indicate the M...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR-corrected at the cluster level. Note: * p<0.005 and cluster...
Clusters that showed smaller GMV in the CCH group than the control group based on whole brain analys...
<p>Reported clusters are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.05 (FWE corrected) after applying a whole brain...
<p>L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; BA, Brodmann's areas; Areas in boldface indicate peaks o...
<p>Activations were successively shown in the OFC (y = 35/39), anterior insula (y = 3/6), amygdala (...
<p>Details on the brain regions in the DMN map (P<0.01, FDR corrected) from the control and HDIs.</p
<p>Note: MTG refers to Superior Temporal Gyrus, ITG to Inferior Temporal Gyrus. Conjunction analysis...
<p>From left to right, columns represent the label for each area as used throughout the paper, the M...
<p>All activations are significant at p<0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster leve...
<p>Cluster sizes of commonly activated brain regions under the N-back task conditions in the control...
<p>Brain regions showing stronger activation in normal-weight versus morbidly obese subjects in inhi...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR corrected at cluster level.</p><p>Brain regions showing inc...
<p>Brain regions showing stronger responses during inhibition minus passive viewing condition (A), i...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR corrected at cluster level.</p><p>Brain regions showing inc...
<p>(FDR <0.05 combined with cluster level corrected, FWE <0.05).</p><p>Notes: x, y, z indicate the M...
<p>Data are thresholded at p < 0.05, FDR-corrected at the cluster level. Note: * p<0.005 and cluster...
Clusters that showed smaller GMV in the CCH group than the control group based on whole brain analys...
<p>Reported clusters are significant at <i>p</i> < 0.05 (FWE corrected) after applying a whole brain...
<p>L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; BA, Brodmann's areas; Areas in boldface indicate peaks o...
<p>Activations were successively shown in the OFC (y = 35/39), anterior insula (y = 3/6), amygdala (...
<p>Details on the brain regions in the DMN map (P<0.01, FDR corrected) from the control and HDIs.</p
<p>Note: MTG refers to Superior Temporal Gyrus, ITG to Inferior Temporal Gyrus. Conjunction analysis...
<p>From left to right, columns represent the label for each area as used throughout the paper, the M...
<p>All activations are significant at p<0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons at the cluster leve...
<p>Cluster sizes of commonly activated brain regions under the N-back task conditions in the control...
<p>Brain regions showing stronger activation in normal-weight versus morbidly obese subjects in inhi...
DOI
Add to ORKG