<p>For preference scores, positive values indicate a preference for the false-belief interpretation and negative values indicate a preference for the reality interpretation. Solid lines indicate the linear trend.</p
<p>Deviation from random choice (female preference = 0.50; dashed line) for high- and low-aggression...
<p>Preference scores (means and standard deviations) for the four settings under low or high attenti...
Recent research has identified a positivity effect in consumers' evaluations of agents, such as frie...
Tangible preference assessments were compared with verbal preference assessments for 6 individuals w...
"The objective of this study is to examine whether manipulating the orientation of a rating scale im...
Studied how value connotations of the response language affect the relationship between judges' atti...
This paper finds preference reversals in measurements of ambiguity aversion, even if psychological a...
The ordinal scale and polychotomous choice methods are two widely used techniques for estimating pre...
<p>Preference scores for the four settings (means and standard deviations) broken out for conditions...
<p>The left panel contains the raw predicted values and the right panel contains difference scores (...
A violation of procedure invariance in preference measurement is that the predominant or prominent a...
Positive values represent intended effects. Standardized Mean Differences of Secondary Outcomes, 95%...
In a context-free preference situation, we conduct a laboratory experiment in which we test higher o...
Mean preference for muscularity score for the pre- and post-manipulation preference phases for each ...
<p>A higher score on the y-axis represents a more healthy implicit food preference. A significant di...
<p>Deviation from random choice (female preference = 0.50; dashed line) for high- and low-aggression...
<p>Preference scores (means and standard deviations) for the four settings under low or high attenti...
Recent research has identified a positivity effect in consumers' evaluations of agents, such as frie...
Tangible preference assessments were compared with verbal preference assessments for 6 individuals w...
"The objective of this study is to examine whether manipulating the orientation of a rating scale im...
Studied how value connotations of the response language affect the relationship between judges' atti...
This paper finds preference reversals in measurements of ambiguity aversion, even if psychological a...
The ordinal scale and polychotomous choice methods are two widely used techniques for estimating pre...
<p>Preference scores for the four settings (means and standard deviations) broken out for conditions...
<p>The left panel contains the raw predicted values and the right panel contains difference scores (...
A violation of procedure invariance in preference measurement is that the predominant or prominent a...
Positive values represent intended effects. Standardized Mean Differences of Secondary Outcomes, 95%...
In a context-free preference situation, we conduct a laboratory experiment in which we test higher o...
Mean preference for muscularity score for the pre- and post-manipulation preference phases for each ...
<p>A higher score on the y-axis represents a more healthy implicit food preference. A significant di...
<p>Deviation from random choice (female preference = 0.50; dashed line) for high- and low-aggression...
<p>Preference scores (means and standard deviations) for the four settings under low or high attenti...
Recent research has identified a positivity effect in consumers' evaluations of agents, such as frie...
DOI
Add to ORKG