<p>(A) DCs were treated to a final concentration of 0 (RPMI 1640), 100 μg/mL EPS and 1 μg/mL LPS, respectively. (B) The expression levels of CD86 were statistical analyzed. All values were means ± SD (n = 3). Statistically significant differences are indicated as follows:*<i>P</i> < 0.05 versus RPMI 1640 group.</p
<p>Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b, CD11c, CD86, CD200R, CXCR4 and Ly6C surface markers expression ...
<p>Expression of CD80 (A) and CD86 (B) was evaluated by flow cytometry based on the FMI analysis in ...
<p>MP were discriminated by their size and structures (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:...
<p>(A) DCs were treated to a final concentration of 0 (RPMI 1640), 100 μg/mL EPS and 1 μg/mL LPS, re...
<p>(A) Phenotypic changes in expression of CD40, CD80 and CD86 maturation markers in TCL-loaded DCs ...
<p>BMDCs were treated by 0 (RPMI 1640), 50, 200 μg/mL EPS and 1 μg/mL LPS, respectively. All values ...
<p>Representative FACS analyses (FACS Diva software, FACS Aria II, BD, CA) of MSCs at passage 3 were...
<p>(A) Representative flow cytometry histogram with overlay of the two groups showing no difference ...
(A, B) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the expression of CD11c (A) and CD11b (B) on BMDC...
<p>DCs were treated with NSRmock, NSR, LPS, LPS+NSRmock or LPS+NSR and were harvested at 0, 4, 8,12,...
<p>PBMC were gated on mDCs as indicated in <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371...
<p>CD44 positive BMSCs were 98.12, 98.85, 93.32, and 94.32%, and CD34 positive cells were 3.25, 2.37...
<p>DCs were transfected with pMAC/PS-scFv. After 48 hours the total DCs were stained with anti-MHCII...
<p>The iDCs were treated with mock, BCG-CS-NPs, UVI-DENV (1, 3 and 10 μg) and DNV (1, 3 and 10 μg) f...
<p>BMDCs were stimulated for 24 hours with the indicated concentrations of LPS and CpG. Cells were a...
<p>Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b, CD11c, CD86, CD200R, CXCR4 and Ly6C surface markers expression ...
<p>Expression of CD80 (A) and CD86 (B) was evaluated by flow cytometry based on the FMI analysis in ...
<p>MP were discriminated by their size and structures (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:...
<p>(A) DCs were treated to a final concentration of 0 (RPMI 1640), 100 μg/mL EPS and 1 μg/mL LPS, re...
<p>(A) Phenotypic changes in expression of CD40, CD80 and CD86 maturation markers in TCL-loaded DCs ...
<p>BMDCs were treated by 0 (RPMI 1640), 50, 200 μg/mL EPS and 1 μg/mL LPS, respectively. All values ...
<p>Representative FACS analyses (FACS Diva software, FACS Aria II, BD, CA) of MSCs at passage 3 were...
<p>(A) Representative flow cytometry histogram with overlay of the two groups showing no difference ...
(A, B) Representative flow cytometry plots showing the expression of CD11c (A) and CD11b (B) on BMDC...
<p>DCs were treated with NSRmock, NSR, LPS, LPS+NSRmock or LPS+NSR and were harvested at 0, 4, 8,12,...
<p>PBMC were gated on mDCs as indicated in <a href="http://www.plosntds.org/article/info:doi/10.1371...
<p>CD44 positive BMSCs were 98.12, 98.85, 93.32, and 94.32%, and CD34 positive cells were 3.25, 2.37...
<p>DCs were transfected with pMAC/PS-scFv. After 48 hours the total DCs were stained with anti-MHCII...
<p>The iDCs were treated with mock, BCG-CS-NPs, UVI-DENV (1, 3 and 10 μg) and DNV (1, 3 and 10 μg) f...
<p>BMDCs were stimulated for 24 hours with the indicated concentrations of LPS and CpG. Cells were a...
<p>Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b, CD11c, CD86, CD200R, CXCR4 and Ly6C surface markers expression ...
<p>Expression of CD80 (A) and CD86 (B) was evaluated by flow cytometry based on the FMI analysis in ...
<p>MP were discriminated by their size and structures (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:...