<p>Values marked with (#) and (*) were significantly and not significantly different from each other, respectively.</p
Comparison of the flooded area between observed and projected GCMs for different return periods.</p
<p>Distance from the source of the flood plume explained 45% of the variation (P<0.05, marked with a...
<p>a) The proportion of microsites where emergence occurred in spring 2010 (first census) is shown r...
<p>Values marked with (#) and (*) were significantly and not significantly different from each other...
<p>Values marked with (*), (+), or (^) were not significantly different from each other.</p
<p>Environmental variables used for modelling and delineating invasion hotspots.</p
<p>Red cells indicate that the mean value for each variable and land use is greater than the global ...
<p>Variables included algal standing crop, insect abundance, salmonid density, salmonid abundance an...
Temporal patterns in mean pairwise beta-deviation across waterbodies (A), species co-occurrence z-sc...
<p>Seasonal variation in behaviour between seasonally-preferred macrohabitats.</p
Relationship between hydrologic connectivity and percentage changes in density and richness after ea...
<p>Coefficient of variation (CV) of pre- and post-harvest population numbers compared with the unexp...
<p>Physical and chemical factor of water and microclimate parameters of the experiment during the ex...
<p>The shaded bars indicate wet habitats and the clear bars represent dry habitats. Note that the un...
<p>Asterisks indicate aggregated variables derived by pooling multiple subcategories (e.g. %mud, %cl...
Comparison of the flooded area between observed and projected GCMs for different return periods.</p
<p>Distance from the source of the flood plume explained 45% of the variation (P<0.05, marked with a...
<p>a) The proportion of microsites where emergence occurred in spring 2010 (first census) is shown r...
<p>Values marked with (#) and (*) were significantly and not significantly different from each other...
<p>Values marked with (*), (+), or (^) were not significantly different from each other.</p
<p>Environmental variables used for modelling and delineating invasion hotspots.</p
<p>Red cells indicate that the mean value for each variable and land use is greater than the global ...
<p>Variables included algal standing crop, insect abundance, salmonid density, salmonid abundance an...
Temporal patterns in mean pairwise beta-deviation across waterbodies (A), species co-occurrence z-sc...
<p>Seasonal variation in behaviour between seasonally-preferred macrohabitats.</p
Relationship between hydrologic connectivity and percentage changes in density and richness after ea...
<p>Coefficient of variation (CV) of pre- and post-harvest population numbers compared with the unexp...
<p>Physical and chemical factor of water and microclimate parameters of the experiment during the ex...
<p>The shaded bars indicate wet habitats and the clear bars represent dry habitats. Note that the un...
<p>Asterisks indicate aggregated variables derived by pooling multiple subcategories (e.g. %mud, %cl...
Comparison of the flooded area between observed and projected GCMs for different return periods.</p
<p>Distance from the source of the flood plume explained 45% of the variation (P<0.05, marked with a...
<p>a) The proportion of microsites where emergence occurred in spring 2010 (first census) is shown r...
DOI
Add to ORKG