<p>The <i>P</i>-value from the comparison of each calculated slope <i>vs</i> slope = 1 (H<sub>O</sub>: slope not different from 1). <i>β</i>, slope with lower and upper confidence intervals at 95% probability within parenthesis; <i>r</i><sup><i>2</i></sup>, explained variance of the model; <i>d</i>.<i>f</i>., degrees of freedom.</p
Biological diversity is to a large extent a matter of variation in size. Proportional (isometric) sc...
<p>(a) Males. (b) Females. The line shows the significant slope from linear regression through the o...
<p>Model I linear regression of mean forearm length against latitude of females and males (n = 16).<...
<p>Models were fitted through standard major axis regression. Note that the slopes estimated for het...
<p>Slopes for limb length are shown in A, whereas slopes for limb inertial properties are shown in B...
<p>The solid black lines indicate the lines of best-fit from a phylogenetic reduced major axis regre...
<p>Significantly positive slopes (red) indicate that the relative gaster size increases as body size...
Red lines represent OLS regression. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals around OLS regre...
<p>Allometric slopes (± 95% CI) determined from four alternative reference characters are paired aga...
<p>R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination; <i>p</i>: probability r = 0; n.s.: non significant (...
<p>A) Stature, B) Body mass, C) Brachial index, D) Crural index. Brackets indicate significant diffe...
<p>The scaling of limb length is depicted in A, limb mass in B, and COM position in C. The scaling o...
<p>A–F depict static allometric scaling relationships of select body characters with metasoma segmen...
<p><i>Top Left</i>: Percent deviation of the estimated ‘correct’ (memorized own) body size (peak of ...
Top: Lin vs. body size. Middle: Lout vs. body size. Bottom: mechanical advantage vs. body size. Red ...
Biological diversity is to a large extent a matter of variation in size. Proportional (isometric) sc...
<p>(a) Males. (b) Females. The line shows the significant slope from linear regression through the o...
<p>Model I linear regression of mean forearm length against latitude of females and males (n = 16).<...
<p>Models were fitted through standard major axis regression. Note that the slopes estimated for het...
<p>Slopes for limb length are shown in A, whereas slopes for limb inertial properties are shown in B...
<p>The solid black lines indicate the lines of best-fit from a phylogenetic reduced major axis regre...
<p>Significantly positive slopes (red) indicate that the relative gaster size increases as body size...
Red lines represent OLS regression. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals around OLS regre...
<p>Allometric slopes (± 95% CI) determined from four alternative reference characters are paired aga...
<p>R<sup>2</sup>: coefficient of determination; <i>p</i>: probability r = 0; n.s.: non significant (...
<p>A) Stature, B) Body mass, C) Brachial index, D) Crural index. Brackets indicate significant diffe...
<p>The scaling of limb length is depicted in A, limb mass in B, and COM position in C. The scaling o...
<p>A–F depict static allometric scaling relationships of select body characters with metasoma segmen...
<p><i>Top Left</i>: Percent deviation of the estimated ‘correct’ (memorized own) body size (peak of ...
Top: Lin vs. body size. Middle: Lout vs. body size. Bottom: mechanical advantage vs. body size. Red ...
Biological diversity is to a large extent a matter of variation in size. Proportional (isometric) sc...
<p>(a) Males. (b) Females. The line shows the significant slope from linear regression through the o...
<p>Model I linear regression of mean forearm length against latitude of females and males (n = 16).<...