<p>Results shown for the comparison of DNA samples (n = 3 per treatment) from BioDried samples that were stored for T<sub>15</sub> and T<sub>30</sub> d (black and blue profiles respectively) with frozen/control samples. Values represent only those peaks present in more than one replicate for the treatments being compared; the number of OTUs used for each analysis is indicated at the bottom-right of each graph; see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0144686#pone.0144686.s016" target="_blank">S2 Table</a> for taxonomy and relative contributions.</p
<p>No significant differences are observed after cryopreservation in the studied genes. DNA damage w...
<p>Each graph represents a pairwise comparison of editing extent that was measured on two libraries ...
Background: Information on the impact of sample storage prior to analysis by DNA methods is limited....
<p>Results shown for the comparison of pooled DNA samples (A, n = 3 per treatment) and average ribos...
<p>Shown are averages, with error bars indicating standard deviations (n = 15). No significant diffe...
<p>A. Comparison between sample types obtained from the same individuals (<i>t</i><sub>(22)</sub> = ...
<p>Four different wild type mice were analyzed, each represented as a track. Top: output from the ra...
<p>Comparison of amplifiable human DNA percentage and genotyping call rate between blood and saliva ...
<p>A) Extent of genomic DNA (gDNA from leukocytes) contamination in the control cell-free DNA (cfDNA...
<p>Serial 10-fold dilution from 1x10<sup>6</sup> U/ml to 1x10<sup>0</sup>U/ml of <i>M</i>. <i>ulcera...
<p><b>A.</b> Comparison of the B and T panels with respect to amplicon targets. Common amplicons had...
<p>a) Number of records in the sedimentary eDNA in relation to vegetation survey distance. b) Percen...
<p>Median numbers of CRISPR2 units in the strains under study, referred to the number of selected ur...
(A) Analysis of relative abundance at the phylum level revealed similar proportions of most prominen...
<p>Each graph shows the mean % of cells showing γ-radiation-induced damage (▴). A cell was considere...
<p>No significant differences are observed after cryopreservation in the studied genes. DNA damage w...
<p>Each graph represents a pairwise comparison of editing extent that was measured on two libraries ...
Background: Information on the impact of sample storage prior to analysis by DNA methods is limited....
<p>Results shown for the comparison of pooled DNA samples (A, n = 3 per treatment) and average ribos...
<p>Shown are averages, with error bars indicating standard deviations (n = 15). No significant diffe...
<p>A. Comparison between sample types obtained from the same individuals (<i>t</i><sub>(22)</sub> = ...
<p>Four different wild type mice were analyzed, each represented as a track. Top: output from the ra...
<p>Comparison of amplifiable human DNA percentage and genotyping call rate between blood and saliva ...
<p>A) Extent of genomic DNA (gDNA from leukocytes) contamination in the control cell-free DNA (cfDNA...
<p>Serial 10-fold dilution from 1x10<sup>6</sup> U/ml to 1x10<sup>0</sup>U/ml of <i>M</i>. <i>ulcera...
<p><b>A.</b> Comparison of the B and T panels with respect to amplicon targets. Common amplicons had...
<p>a) Number of records in the sedimentary eDNA in relation to vegetation survey distance. b) Percen...
<p>Median numbers of CRISPR2 units in the strains under study, referred to the number of selected ur...
(A) Analysis of relative abundance at the phylum level revealed similar proportions of most prominen...
<p>Each graph shows the mean % of cells showing γ-radiation-induced damage (▴). A cell was considere...
<p>No significant differences are observed after cryopreservation in the studied genes. DNA damage w...
<p>Each graph represents a pairwise comparison of editing extent that was measured on two libraries ...
Background: Information on the impact of sample storage prior to analysis by DNA methods is limited....