Table S15. Phenotypes for the 50 RIL-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 50, h 2=0.8 with 25 replications. (TXT 2078 kb
Figure S1. Percentage of difference between estimated and true (simulated) QTL effects for joint com...
Table S2. Comparisions of the power of QTL detection 1- β ∗ among the joint inclusive composite inte...
These files contain the supporting data for manuscript: Jinquan LI, Anja Bus, Viola Spamer, Benjamin...
Table S14. Phenotypes for the 50 DH-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 50, h 2=0.8 with 2...
Table S17. Phenotypes for the 29 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 25, h 2=0.8 with 2...
Table S18. Phenotypes for the 29 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 50, h 2=0.5 with 2...
Table S19. Phenotypes for the 29 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 100, h 2=0.5 with ...
Table S12. Phenotypes for the 50 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 50, h 2=0.8, 0.15 ...
Table S113. Phenotypes for the 50 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 50, h 2=0.8, 0.25...
Table S9. Phenotypes for the 50 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 1 which interacted ...
Table S10. Phenotypes for the 50 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 25, h 2=0.8, 0.75 ...
Table S6. Genotypes for the 50 DH-NAM subpopulations, where 0 and 2 denote the homozygous gentoypes ...
Table S3. Genotypes for the simulated 51 parental inbreds at the simulated 10 K SNPs. (XLSX 31 kb
Table S5. Genotypes for the 50 BC-NAM subpopulations, where 0 and 2 denote the homozygous gentoype o...
Table S4. Marker name and its position at chromosome for the simulated 10 K SNPs. (XLSX 3133 kb
Figure S1. Percentage of difference between estimated and true (simulated) QTL effects for joint com...
Table S2. Comparisions of the power of QTL detection 1- β ∗ among the joint inclusive composite inte...
These files contain the supporting data for manuscript: Jinquan LI, Anja Bus, Viola Spamer, Benjamin...
Table S14. Phenotypes for the 50 DH-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 50, h 2=0.8 with 2...
Table S17. Phenotypes for the 29 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 25, h 2=0.8 with 2...
Table S18. Phenotypes for the 29 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 50, h 2=0.5 with 2...
Table S19. Phenotypes for the 29 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 100, h 2=0.5 with ...
Table S12. Phenotypes for the 50 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 50, h 2=0.8, 0.15 ...
Table S113. Phenotypes for the 50 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 50, h 2=0.8, 0.25...
Table S9. Phenotypes for the 50 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 1 which interacted ...
Table S10. Phenotypes for the 50 BC-NAM subpopulations in a scenario where QTLs = 25, h 2=0.8, 0.75 ...
Table S6. Genotypes for the 50 DH-NAM subpopulations, where 0 and 2 denote the homozygous gentoypes ...
Table S3. Genotypes for the simulated 51 parental inbreds at the simulated 10 K SNPs. (XLSX 31 kb
Table S5. Genotypes for the 50 BC-NAM subpopulations, where 0 and 2 denote the homozygous gentoype o...
Table S4. Marker name and its position at chromosome for the simulated 10 K SNPs. (XLSX 3133 kb
Figure S1. Percentage of difference between estimated and true (simulated) QTL effects for joint com...
Table S2. Comparisions of the power of QTL detection 1- β ∗ among the joint inclusive composite inte...
These files contain the supporting data for manuscript: Jinquan LI, Anja Bus, Viola Spamer, Benjamin...
DOI
Add to ORKG