There is merit in studies with heterogeneous study populations. They allow exploration of the extent to which the performance of a diagnostic test depends on prespecified predictors, and how much residual variation exists. The more variation there is in study populations, the greater the potential to know how the test will perform in various settings
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Internal validation of a diagnostic test estimates the degree of random er...
The aim of diagnostic accuracy studies is to evaluate how accurately a diagnostic test can distingui...
Objective To classify the sources of bias and variation and to provide an updated summary of the evi...
There may be genuine differences between test accuracies in different settings, such as primary care...
There is merit in studies with heterogeneous study populations. They allow exploration of the extent...
Background Systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions are now commonplace in many if not most a...
Following a meta-analysis of test accuracy studies, the translation of summary results into clinical...
BACKGROUND: Studies with methodologic shortcomings can overestimate the accuracy of a medical test...
BACKGROUND: Studies of diagnostic accuracy are subject to different sources of bias and variation t...
BACKGROUND: Studies with methodologic shortcomings can overestimate the accuracy of a medical test...
It is indispensable for any meta-analysis that potential sources of heterogeneity are examined, befo...
The salient question to ask when evaluating a diagnostic test is “Does the use of this test lead to ...
CITATION: Naaktgeboren, C. A., et al. 2016. Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews o...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Internal validation of a diagnostic test estimates the degree of random er...
Diagnostic accuracy studies are fundamental for the assessment of diagnostic tests. Researchers need...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Internal validation of a diagnostic test estimates the degree of random er...
The aim of diagnostic accuracy studies is to evaluate how accurately a diagnostic test can distingui...
Objective To classify the sources of bias and variation and to provide an updated summary of the evi...
There may be genuine differences between test accuracies in different settings, such as primary care...
There is merit in studies with heterogeneous study populations. They allow exploration of the extent...
Background Systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions are now commonplace in many if not most a...
Following a meta-analysis of test accuracy studies, the translation of summary results into clinical...
BACKGROUND: Studies with methodologic shortcomings can overestimate the accuracy of a medical test...
BACKGROUND: Studies of diagnostic accuracy are subject to different sources of bias and variation t...
BACKGROUND: Studies with methodologic shortcomings can overestimate the accuracy of a medical test...
It is indispensable for any meta-analysis that potential sources of heterogeneity are examined, befo...
The salient question to ask when evaluating a diagnostic test is “Does the use of this test lead to ...
CITATION: Naaktgeboren, C. A., et al. 2016. Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews o...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Internal validation of a diagnostic test estimates the degree of random er...
Diagnostic accuracy studies are fundamental for the assessment of diagnostic tests. Researchers need...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Internal validation of a diagnostic test estimates the degree of random er...
The aim of diagnostic accuracy studies is to evaluate how accurately a diagnostic test can distingui...
Objective To classify the sources of bias and variation and to provide an updated summary of the evi...