<p>Pairwise comparisons between attitudinal evaluation biases within the pro-arguments.</p
<p>Comparing the characteristics of presumptive TB cases evaluated by algorithm.</p
<p>*A negative value indicates that the first assemblage have a higher species packing than the seco...
<p>Note:</p><p>***<i>p</i> < .001</p><p>Pairwise comparisons from the logistic model of the inequity...
Statistical p values for pairwise comparisons of two specific items included in each topic of the at...
Statistical p values for pairwise comparisons of two specific items included in each topic of the co...
Statistical p values for pairwise comparisons of two specific items included in each topic of the pr...
<p>Pairwise comparisons to distinguish the “suspects” from POAG and healthy controls.</p
<p>Differences (95% CI) and p-values of pairwise comparisons between footwear conditions.</p
Pairwise comparison of conditions with the after-effect adjusted for deviation prior to exposure.</p
Pairwise comparisons (positive, neutral, negative) with SCRs as the dependent variable (n = 53).</p
<p>Pairwise comparisons of classification frequency ranks for the emotion models.</p
Pairwise contrast on the estimates of the sociodemographic variables for the path analysis.</p
<p>Bayesian pairwise comparisons across emotions by type of intensity with accuracy in emotion recog...
<p>Comparison of unadjusted and adjusted effect estimates (odds ratios) on outcome variables.</p
<p>Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.</p
<p>Comparing the characteristics of presumptive TB cases evaluated by algorithm.</p
<p>*A negative value indicates that the first assemblage have a higher species packing than the seco...
<p>Note:</p><p>***<i>p</i> < .001</p><p>Pairwise comparisons from the logistic model of the inequity...
Statistical p values for pairwise comparisons of two specific items included in each topic of the at...
Statistical p values for pairwise comparisons of two specific items included in each topic of the co...
Statistical p values for pairwise comparisons of two specific items included in each topic of the pr...
<p>Pairwise comparisons to distinguish the “suspects” from POAG and healthy controls.</p
<p>Differences (95% CI) and p-values of pairwise comparisons between footwear conditions.</p
Pairwise comparison of conditions with the after-effect adjusted for deviation prior to exposure.</p
Pairwise comparisons (positive, neutral, negative) with SCRs as the dependent variable (n = 53).</p
<p>Pairwise comparisons of classification frequency ranks for the emotion models.</p
Pairwise contrast on the estimates of the sociodemographic variables for the path analysis.</p
<p>Bayesian pairwise comparisons across emotions by type of intensity with accuracy in emotion recog...
<p>Comparison of unadjusted and adjusted effect estimates (odds ratios) on outcome variables.</p
<p>Comparison of the empirical power for the top 3 methods for two-sided tests.</p
<p>Comparing the characteristics of presumptive TB cases evaluated by algorithm.</p
<p>*A negative value indicates that the first assemblage have a higher species packing than the seco...
<p>Note:</p><p>***<i>p</i> < .001</p><p>Pairwise comparisons from the logistic model of the inequity...
DOI
Add to ORKG