Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Forests: Socio-economic problems with farm forestry of rainforest timber production in North Queensland

Although it is now six years since the signing of the Convention on Biological Diversity and Agreement on Forest Principles, there seem to have been few improvements in the sustainable management of biodiversity in forests. In reality, most forest managers have little understanding of biodiversity issues and how they can improve the maintenance of biodiversity. Recognizing this problem, eight priority forest research needs (Box 1) were identified by the Conference of the Parties on Biological Diversity (CBD) at its third meeting in Buenos Aires, in November 1996, based on recommendations from the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical, and Technological Advice (SBSTTA). The first part of this paper discusses some of the advances made towards answering some of these questions, through the use of a number of case studies. The relationship between biodiversity and sustainability in managed forest systems is very poorly understood. Some have looked at how species composition and abundance, or assemblage structure, changes with forest disturbance and use, but often these studies have been based on single taxa. Others are looking at rapid biodiversity assessment techniques for sampling indicator groups. In practice, these studies are often designed with a view to identifying a number of key groups that might act as surrogates for others. A third approach is taken by those who investigate the relationship between biodiversity and forest ecosystem processes. In this paper, we argue that this third approach may hold the greatest utility for those concerned with assessing the sustainable management and use of forests, particularly in developing countries where resources for such exercises are extremely limited. In particular, a new approach to assessing sustainable management of forests, criteria and indicators, shows considerable promise and is discussed here