<p>A) Textured 3D surface mesh of <i>Gardineroseris planulata</i>. B) Same untextured 3D surface mesh of <i>Gardineroseris planulata</i>. Scale bar represents 7.6 mm. C) Textured 3D surface mesh of <i>Echinopora lamellosa</i>. D) Same untextured 3D surface mesh of <i>Echinopora lamellosa</i>. Scale bar represents 6.8 mm. E) Textured 3D surface mesh of <i>Pocillopora verrucosa</i>. F) Same untextured 3D surface mesh of <i>Pocillopora verrucosa</i>. Scale bar represents 4.4 mm. G) Textured 3D surface mesh of <i>Porites lutea</i>. H) Same untextured 3D surface mesh of <i>Porites lutea</i>. Scale bar represents 3.6 mm.</p
Understanding the three-dimensional (3D) surface complexity of biological systems can yield fundamen...
Fig. 21. A. 3D model of the Omorgus gigas (Harold, 1872) beetle after a quick segmentation, includin...
FIGURE 2. SEM images showing Planhoogenraadia wuchanica sp. nov. (A) lateral view; (B) the upper cap...
<p>A) <i>Acropora</i> sp. 1. B) <i>Pocillopora verrucosa</i>. C) <i>Platygyra daedalea</i>. D) <i>Ac...
Methods for 3D‐imaging of biological samples are experiencing unprecedented development, with tools ...
<p><b>A)</b> Picture (taken with a stereoscopic microscope) of a skin patch of a juvenile <i>Phelsum...
Model organisms are perhaps the most important experimental subjects in biology nowadays. These spec...
It is a dataset for ten algae species (Chlamydomonas, Cladophora, Nostoc, Oedogonium, Oscillatoria, ...
FIGURE 7. Virtual reconstructions of the internal structure of Smittina imragueni n. sp. (paratype S...
The surface geometry of an organism represents the boundary of its three-dimensional (3D) form and c...
The surface geometry of an organism represents the boundary of its three-dimensional (3D) form and c...
FIGURE 1. 3D model of Oziella sibirica sp. nov. prodorsal shield (the same female as Fig. 2C). A. Gr...
FIGURE 9. Scatter plots showing length (A) and width (B) of orifices and frontal pores automatically...
FIGURE 8. Scatter plots showing the volume (A), length (B), width (C) and depth (D) of zooidal and a...
Fig. 6.11. Comparison between the Focus Stacking Photogrammetry model (left) and the µCT model (righ...
Understanding the three-dimensional (3D) surface complexity of biological systems can yield fundamen...
Fig. 21. A. 3D model of the Omorgus gigas (Harold, 1872) beetle after a quick segmentation, includin...
FIGURE 2. SEM images showing Planhoogenraadia wuchanica sp. nov. (A) lateral view; (B) the upper cap...
<p>A) <i>Acropora</i> sp. 1. B) <i>Pocillopora verrucosa</i>. C) <i>Platygyra daedalea</i>. D) <i>Ac...
Methods for 3D‐imaging of biological samples are experiencing unprecedented development, with tools ...
<p><b>A)</b> Picture (taken with a stereoscopic microscope) of a skin patch of a juvenile <i>Phelsum...
Model organisms are perhaps the most important experimental subjects in biology nowadays. These spec...
It is a dataset for ten algae species (Chlamydomonas, Cladophora, Nostoc, Oedogonium, Oscillatoria, ...
FIGURE 7. Virtual reconstructions of the internal structure of Smittina imragueni n. sp. (paratype S...
The surface geometry of an organism represents the boundary of its three-dimensional (3D) form and c...
The surface geometry of an organism represents the boundary of its three-dimensional (3D) form and c...
FIGURE 1. 3D model of Oziella sibirica sp. nov. prodorsal shield (the same female as Fig. 2C). A. Gr...
FIGURE 9. Scatter plots showing length (A) and width (B) of orifices and frontal pores automatically...
FIGURE 8. Scatter plots showing the volume (A), length (B), width (C) and depth (D) of zooidal and a...
Fig. 6.11. Comparison between the Focus Stacking Photogrammetry model (left) and the µCT model (righ...
Understanding the three-dimensional (3D) surface complexity of biological systems can yield fundamen...
Fig. 21. A. 3D model of the Omorgus gigas (Harold, 1872) beetle after a quick segmentation, includin...
FIGURE 2. SEM images showing Planhoogenraadia wuchanica sp. nov. (A) lateral view; (B) the upper cap...