Comparison of different species scenarios resulting from GMYC and bPTP analyses, along with the species clusters proposed by Darienko et al.[4].

<p>The topologies shown were obtained by BEAST analyses based on concatenated SSU + ITS rDNA (<b>A</b>) and ITS rDNA (<b>B</b>) datasets, using alignments reduced to include only well-aligned ITS positions. The red coloration delimits species clusters recognized by GMYC analyses; a hatched (red) pattern indicates the GMYC clusters containing genetically identical sequences. The pink coloration delimits the eight species clusters proposed by Darienko et al.[<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0151137#pone.0151137.ref004" target="_blank">4</a>]. Different species scenarios proposed by GMYC and bPTP analyses are indicated by vertical bars next to the phylogenetic trees. For each topology, two different datasets were analysed (including original and reduced ITS rDNA alignment to include only well-aligned ITS positions). The species clusters are either assigned to previously described <i>Coccomyxa</i> species or labelled alphabetically. Clade colouring follows the <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0151137#pone.0151137.g004" target="_blank">Fig 4</a>. Scale bars represent the expected number of substitutions per site.