<p>Comparison of the PTT between affected and unaffected sectors in the three groups.</p
Comparisons of the prosthesis type used between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
Comparison of patient characteristics between CCT and control groups before and after PS matching.</...
<p><i>P</i>-values of comparisons between the different groups analyzed in the present study.</p
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
<p>Comparing the changes of SPT and serum laboratory data between SLIT and non-SLIT groups.</p
CMT and Control group comparisons of stabilometric variables at all conditions.</p
<p>Comparison of general conditions and clinical manifestations between the groups.</p
<p>Comparison of the time-to-event outcomes between the untested and tested groups.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Comparisons of means and relative frequencies across outcome variables in the matched groups.</p
<p>Comparison of structural alternative model and path magnitudes between four groups.</p
Comparison of laboratory parameters of SFTS patients in the HPE and AP groups.</p
<p>Comparison of the scores before and after the intervention in the three groups.</p
Descriptive statistics and group comparisons of baseline and PD characteristics.</p
Between-group comparison of "respiratory physical assessment implementation".</p
Comparisons of the prosthesis type used between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
Comparison of patient characteristics between CCT and control groups before and after PS matching.</...
<p><i>P</i>-values of comparisons between the different groups analyzed in the present study.</p
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
<p>Comparing the changes of SPT and serum laboratory data between SLIT and non-SLIT groups.</p
CMT and Control group comparisons of stabilometric variables at all conditions.</p
<p>Comparison of general conditions and clinical manifestations between the groups.</p
<p>Comparison of the time-to-event outcomes between the untested and tested groups.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Comparisons of means and relative frequencies across outcome variables in the matched groups.</p
<p>Comparison of structural alternative model and path magnitudes between four groups.</p
Comparison of laboratory parameters of SFTS patients in the HPE and AP groups.</p
<p>Comparison of the scores before and after the intervention in the three groups.</p
Descriptive statistics and group comparisons of baseline and PD characteristics.</p
Between-group comparison of "respiratory physical assessment implementation".</p
Comparisons of the prosthesis type used between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
Comparison of patient characteristics between CCT and control groups before and after PS matching.</...
<p><i>P</i>-values of comparisons between the different groups analyzed in the present study.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG