Relationship between the observed (x-axis) and predicted (y-axis) cell proportions in the BSGS dataset split by cell type. Cell proportions were predicted utilizing methylation data with Houseman et al. [21] method re-trained on Reinius et al. [19] dataset. The predicted proportions were calibrated on the 422 subsample that have cellular composition measured to have a slope equal one and an intercept equal zero when regressed on observed proportions (see Table S1 for correlations between observed and predicted proportions). The red line is an identity line. (PDF 27 kb
Figure S1. Overview of the EvoImmunoPop experimental setting. Figure S2. Exploring the non-linear ef...
Scatterplot illustrating correlation between methylation beta values in all samples (Nâ=â55 pair...
Distribution of probe variance explained by the best SNP. For each unique expression and methylation...
Distribution of the number of nodes per graph component. Expression and methylation levels were adju...
The 3321 probe pairs from the final correlation list. Phenotypic Person correlation and genetic corr...
Distribution of the heritability of expression and methylation probes from the final list of correla...
Figure S1. Change in blood cell counts after DEX administration. A) Actual blood cell counts at base...
Graph representation of the correlation structure for the same chromosome probe pairs with shared QT...
Methylation of the TCEB3C cluster and ZAV macrosatellite in FSHD2 and control individuals. Relative ...
Figure S3. Comparison of all methods for inferring CpG methylation levels based on DNA enrichment da...
The number of the same chromosome probes pairs with shared QTL(s) from the final correlation list th...
Figure S1. Comparison of the methods MEDIPS_normal and MEDIPS. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC)...
Performance of Abbas et al. method in our validation datasets (Gene ST). Predicted cell proportions ...
Exploratory data analysis of putative biological confounders. a) Variance explained per principal co...
Correlation of methylation level at different gene features with transcript and protein expression l...
Figure S1. Overview of the EvoImmunoPop experimental setting. Figure S2. Exploring the non-linear ef...
Scatterplot illustrating correlation between methylation beta values in all samples (Nâ=â55 pair...
Distribution of probe variance explained by the best SNP. For each unique expression and methylation...
Distribution of the number of nodes per graph component. Expression and methylation levels were adju...
The 3321 probe pairs from the final correlation list. Phenotypic Person correlation and genetic corr...
Distribution of the heritability of expression and methylation probes from the final list of correla...
Figure S1. Change in blood cell counts after DEX administration. A) Actual blood cell counts at base...
Graph representation of the correlation structure for the same chromosome probe pairs with shared QT...
Methylation of the TCEB3C cluster and ZAV macrosatellite in FSHD2 and control individuals. Relative ...
Figure S3. Comparison of all methods for inferring CpG methylation levels based on DNA enrichment da...
The number of the same chromosome probes pairs with shared QTL(s) from the final correlation list th...
Figure S1. Comparison of the methods MEDIPS_normal and MEDIPS. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC)...
Performance of Abbas et al. method in our validation datasets (Gene ST). Predicted cell proportions ...
Exploratory data analysis of putative biological confounders. a) Variance explained per principal co...
Correlation of methylation level at different gene features with transcript and protein expression l...
Figure S1. Overview of the EvoImmunoPop experimental setting. Figure S2. Exploring the non-linear ef...
Scatterplot illustrating correlation between methylation beta values in all samples (Nâ=â55 pair...
Distribution of probe variance explained by the best SNP. For each unique expression and methylation...