<p>Average Cone Density, Spacing, and Voronoi (Mean ± SD) at 500-μm Eccentricity.</p
(A) Example cone mosaics simulated by our computational observer model. The highest tested cone dens...
AbstractFoveal cone spacing was measured in vivo using an objective technique: ocular speckle interf...
The aim of this article is to analyse cone density, spacing and arrangement using an adaptive optics...
<p>Cone density values calculated in each sampling area at 1.5 degree temporal and superior eccentri...
<p>Preferred packing arrangement of cones (average ± SD, %) calculated using Voronoi tiles at 418 µm...
<p>Cone Spacing Comparisons at 500-μm Eccentricity<sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:...
<p>Preferred packing arrangement of cones (average ± SD, %) calculated using Voronoi tiles at 1.5 de...
<p>Mean ± standard deviation (minimum—maximum) cone density including manual correction for all ecce...
<p>***: <i>P</i> <0.001, Wilcoxon’s signed rank test.</p><p>Cone density at 1- degree and 3-degree r...
<p>Mean ± standard deviation (minimum—maximum) cone spacing, including manual correction, for all ec...
<p>(A) A cone mosaic image 0.5 mm from the center of the fovea in a normal eye. (B) Cone labeling re...
<p>Each data point is the average density (thousands of cells/mm<sup>2</sup>) for an individual (poo...
Cone density falls off sharply with eccentricity, and also varies between horizontal and vertical re...
<p>Voronoi (6 tiles) Comparisons at 500-μm Eccentricity<sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/...
Contrast thresholds (y-axis) were averaged across three observers reported in Cameron, Tai, and Carr...
(A) Example cone mosaics simulated by our computational observer model. The highest tested cone dens...
AbstractFoveal cone spacing was measured in vivo using an objective technique: ocular speckle interf...
The aim of this article is to analyse cone density, spacing and arrangement using an adaptive optics...
<p>Cone density values calculated in each sampling area at 1.5 degree temporal and superior eccentri...
<p>Preferred packing arrangement of cones (average ± SD, %) calculated using Voronoi tiles at 418 µm...
<p>Cone Spacing Comparisons at 500-μm Eccentricity<sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:...
<p>Preferred packing arrangement of cones (average ± SD, %) calculated using Voronoi tiles at 1.5 de...
<p>Mean ± standard deviation (minimum—maximum) cone density including manual correction for all ecce...
<p>***: <i>P</i> <0.001, Wilcoxon’s signed rank test.</p><p>Cone density at 1- degree and 3-degree r...
<p>Mean ± standard deviation (minimum—maximum) cone spacing, including manual correction, for all ec...
<p>(A) A cone mosaic image 0.5 mm from the center of the fovea in a normal eye. (B) Cone labeling re...
<p>Each data point is the average density (thousands of cells/mm<sup>2</sup>) for an individual (poo...
Cone density falls off sharply with eccentricity, and also varies between horizontal and vertical re...
<p>Voronoi (6 tiles) Comparisons at 500-μm Eccentricity<sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/...
Contrast thresholds (y-axis) were averaged across three observers reported in Cameron, Tai, and Carr...
(A) Example cone mosaics simulated by our computational observer model. The highest tested cone dens...
AbstractFoveal cone spacing was measured in vivo using an objective technique: ocular speckle interf...
The aim of this article is to analyse cone density, spacing and arrangement using an adaptive optics...
DOI
Add to ORKG