MOESM1 of Contribution of actin filaments and microtubules to cell elongation and alignment depends on the grating depth of microgratings

Additional file 1: Figure S1. (A) A phase contrast image of TCPS surface. Bar, 100 μm. (B) An imageshowing FN-lines (1 μm line and spacing) obtained by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) (Dimension 3100with a Nanoscope III controller, Digital Instruments) using silicon cantilevers (spring constant; 50 Nm-1)(RTESP, Veeco Probes) in contact mode. (C-E) SEM (Scanning electron microscopy) (6010 LV, JEOL)images showing the cross section of three different microgratings; 1 μm gratings with 0.35 um depth (C) and1 μm depth (D) and 2 μm gratings with 2 μm depth (E). Figure S2. (A) Fluorescence image of a RPE-1 cell stably expressing GFP/centrin cell on 1 μm gratings (1 μm deep). Bar, 30 μm. A yellow arrow indicates the direction of cell elongation. (B) Average cell aspect ratio (R) of cells on 1 μm gratings (0.35 or 1 μm deep) and 2 μm gratings with/without CD treatment. n: number of cells. ***P < 0.001. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and a Bonferroni post hoc test. Error bar denotes the standard deviation of the mean. Figure S3. Alignment of actin and vinculin to the different substrates (Flat TCPS surface, FN-lines, and 1 μm gratings (0.35 or 1μm deep)). The alignment angle was measured as an angle difference of actin or vinculin orientation to the long axis of a cell on flat PDMS surface or the long axis of the FN-line or each micrograting. #: the number of cells. Error bar denotes the standard deviation of the mean. Figure S4. Merged image of MTs (Green fluorescence) and pattern (phase contrast) of cells on 1 μm grating (1 μm deep) in the presenceof CD at 1 μM