Estimates of the rate of change of response accuracy for humans, measured in log-odds units of probability per trial. Pairs are sorted by symbolic distance and by joint rank. Boxes represent 80% credible intervals, while whiskers represent 99% credible intervals. Individual pairs are color-coded identically to Figures 2-5. (Left). Learning rate at the start of phase 2. Pairs including stimulus F tended to show much faster improvement. (Right). Learning rate at the start of phase 3. Novels pairs showed elevated learning, and most learning rates were higher than those observed in monkeys
Circles represent empirical averages of observed performance, while box-and-whisker plots represent ...
<p>Two animals fully trained in the categorization task learned two hitherto unknown categories (<i>...
Correlations between log mean brain size, log mean adaptive knowledge, log mean group size, mean soc...
Estimates of the rate of change of response accuracy for monkeys, measured in log-odds units of prob...
Proportion of correct responses by monkeys for stimulus pairs over successive trials. Shaded areas r...
Monkey reaction times (log-transformed) over successive trials. Shaded areas represent 99% credible ...
<p>Scatter plots of population hit rate and response time in the first versus last segment of trials...
<p>The learning trend versus trial number for the conditions of Experiment 2 and Experiment 3 plus a...
<p>A. Learning rate as a function of prediction error, SD of the generative distribution and treatme...
Understanding how an animal’s ability to learn relates to neural activity or is altered by lesions, ...
<p>Early training comprised the first 10(A–B and C–D respectively) there was a significant decrease ...
<p>Estimates compare performance by subjects (blue lines) to those generated by simulations using ea...
<p>Response accuracy by a rhesus monkey performing a transitive inference task over 51 sessions. (To...
<p>Learning rates computed from each of our regions of interest, overlaid on the learning rates fit ...
<p>Accuracy and mean reaction times (RTs, in ms ± SEM) for different set sizes and response-hemifiel...
Circles represent empirical averages of observed performance, while box-and-whisker plots represent ...
<p>Two animals fully trained in the categorization task learned two hitherto unknown categories (<i>...
Correlations between log mean brain size, log mean adaptive knowledge, log mean group size, mean soc...
Estimates of the rate of change of response accuracy for monkeys, measured in log-odds units of prob...
Proportion of correct responses by monkeys for stimulus pairs over successive trials. Shaded areas r...
Monkey reaction times (log-transformed) over successive trials. Shaded areas represent 99% credible ...
<p>Scatter plots of population hit rate and response time in the first versus last segment of trials...
<p>The learning trend versus trial number for the conditions of Experiment 2 and Experiment 3 plus a...
<p>A. Learning rate as a function of prediction error, SD of the generative distribution and treatme...
Understanding how an animal’s ability to learn relates to neural activity or is altered by lesions, ...
<p>Early training comprised the first 10(A–B and C–D respectively) there was a significant decrease ...
<p>Estimates compare performance by subjects (blue lines) to those generated by simulations using ea...
<p>Response accuracy by a rhesus monkey performing a transitive inference task over 51 sessions. (To...
<p>Learning rates computed from each of our regions of interest, overlaid on the learning rates fit ...
<p>Accuracy and mean reaction times (RTs, in ms ± SEM) for different set sizes and response-hemifiel...
Circles represent empirical averages of observed performance, while box-and-whisker plots represent ...
<p>Two animals fully trained in the categorization task learned two hitherto unknown categories (<i>...
Correlations between log mean brain size, log mean adaptive knowledge, log mean group size, mean soc...