Ask
Search
My library
ORKG

ORKG Ask

Our mission is to organize scholarly knowledge and make it accessible to humans and machines.

About

About ORKG Ask
Report issue
Statistics
Contact

Legal

Terms of use
Data protection (sheet)
Imprint
Accessibility
License

Technical

We
open source
System status
Changelog
Frontend: v1.41.0
Backend: v1.13.4

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

Comparison of the human ABCA1 CGI to standard and stringent CGI definitions.

Yun-Cheng Lv (463141)
Yan-Yan Tang (463145)
Ping Zhang (86495)
Wei Wan (793804)
Feng Yao (44334)
Ping-Ping He (463143)
Wei Xie (16543)
Zhong-Cheng Mo (2832962)
Jin-Feng Shi (2832956)
Jian-Feng Wu (795593)
Juan Peng (646484)
Dan Liu (108669)
Francisco S. Cayabyab (2832953)
Xi-Long Zheng (2342863)
Xiang-Yang Tang (2832959)
Xin-Ping Ouyang (463142)
Chao-Ke Tang (463148)

Publication date

June 2016

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0157265.t001

Abstract

<p>Comparison of the human ABCA1 CGI to standard and stringent CGI definitions.</p

Extracted data

Related items

Reference table for the different SNR/CNR definitions based on a contrast.

Marijke Welvaert (480915)
Yves Rosseel (480916)

November 2013

<p>Reference table for the different SNR/CNR definitions based on a contrast.</p

Comparison in-term of classification accuracy while using Caltech-101 image dataset.

Nouman Ali (2836616)
Bushra Zafar (5352842)
Faisal Riaz (4482895)
Saadat Hanif Dar (5681471)
Naeem Iqbal Ratyal (5681474)
Khalid Bashir Bajwa (2697808)
Muhammad Kashif Iqbal (3830311)
Muhammad Sajid (710360)

September 2018

Comparison in-term of classification accuracy while using Caltech-101 image dataset.</p

Comparison of using different data compositions of synthetic images for training the classifier and then testing it on the 724 real images.

Rajkumar Theagarajan (6429590)
Bir Bhanu (2154277)

March 2019

Comparison of using different data compositions of synthetic images for training the classifier and ...

Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.

Frits A. Rangel (392221)
Thomas J. J. Maal (356232)
Ewald M. Bronkhorst (144659)
K. Hero Breuning (356233)
Jan G. J. H. Schols (392222)
Stefaan J. Bergé (144662)
Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman (144666)

March 2013

<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p

Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.

Wei Zheng (25452)
Xiaoya Zhang (744862)
Qi Lu (143184)

May 2015

<p>Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.</p

Standardized difference (SD) between C.L.I.M.B.<sup>a</sup> and comparison in the pre- and post-period respectively.

Zhehui Luo (419925)
Canopy Roychoudhury (14266171)
William S. Pompos (14266174)
James DiMaria (14266177)
Cynthia M. Robinette (14266180)
Purva H. Gore (14266183)
Rohon Roychoudhury (14266186)
William Beecroft (14266189)

December 2022

Standardized difference (SD) between C.L.I.M.B.a and comparison in the pre- and post-period respecti...

Comparison of the estimated PIC values calculated for the two different marker systems, TBP and SSR.

Floriana Gavazzi (3127005)
Luca Braglia (3126996)
Francesco Mastromauro (3126999)
Silvia Gianì (3127002)
Laura Morello (3127008)
Diego Breviario (3127011)

September 2016

<p>Comparison of the estimated PIC values calculated for the two different marker systems, TBP and S...

Comparisons of the characteristics of the seven different types of 2D barcodes.

Chang Liu (35901)
Linchun Shi (120476)
Xiaolan Xu (166867)
Huan Li (120482)
Hang Xing (166876)
Dong Liang (120479)
Kun Jiang (166885)
Xiaohui Pang (108739)
Jingyuan Song (108742)
Shilin Chen (85587)

May 2012

<p>Comparisons of the characteristics of the seven different types of 2D barcodes.</p

Anatomical structures evaluated in image quality assessment for the different sequences.

Mads Andersen (3498599)
Isabella M. Björkman-Burtscher (6324371)
Anouk Marsman (6710930)
Esben Thade Petersen (6710933)
Vincent Oltman Boer (6710936)

May 2019

Anatomical structures evaluated in image quality assessment for the different sequences.</p

Comparisons of the prosthesis type used between the severe group and the moderate group.

Seung Ah Lee (342223)
Seung-Baik Kang (4922665)
Chong Bum Chang (5848382)
Moon Jong Chang (4114618)
Young Jun Kim (844626)
Min Kyu Song (5848385)
Jin Hwa Jeong (5848388)

October 2018

Comparisons of the prosthesis type used between the severe group and the moderate group.</p

Comparison of ISS from manual coding versus ISS from automated conversion by categories.

Rebeca Abajas-Bustillo (6655607)
Francisco José Amo-Setién (3625700)
César Leal-Costa (6655610)
María del Carmen Ortego-Mate (6655613)
María Seguí-Gómez (6655616)
María Jesús Durá-Ros (6655619)
Mark R. Zonfrillo (3096264)

May 2019

Comparison of ISS from manual coding versus ISS from automated conversion by categories.</p

Comparison of the reference values provided by manufacturer and by our research.

Zhongjuan Liu (3211344)
Chuiwen Deng (611176)
Ping Li (31981)
Jingxia Wang (692422)
Lijuan Ma (4335364)
Yongzhe Li (528191)
Yingchun Xu (320157)

March 2018

<p>Comparison of the reference values provided by manufacturer and by our research.</p

Comparison of CEUS parameters between the different gastric lesions (P value).

Tingting Li (10553)
Man Lu (477856)
Jun Song (19318)
Ping Wu (46628)
Xueqing Cheng (3229950)
Zhenqi Zhang (1707127)

August 2017

<p>Comparison of CEUS parameters between the different gastric lesions (P value).</p

Comparison of classification accuracy while using different sizes of vocabulary.

Nouman Ali (2836616)
Bushra Zafar (5352842)
Faisal Riaz (4482895)
Saadat Hanif Dar (5681471)
Naeem Iqbal Ratyal (5681474)
Khalid Bashir Bajwa (2697808)
Muhammad Kashif Iqbal (3830311)
Muhammad Sajid (710360)

September 2018

Comparison of classification accuracy while using different sizes of vocabulary.</p

Comparison of singular values of <i>C</i> and <i>A</i> of 512 × 512 image.

Ying Li (38224)
Musheng Wei (3812512)
Fengxia Zhang (115332)
Jianli Zhao (584000)

March 2017

<p>Comparison of singular values of <i>C</i> and <i>A</i> of 512 × 512 image.</p

Reference table for the different SNR/CNR definitions based on a contrast.

Marijke Welvaert (480915)
Yves Rosseel (480916)

November 2013

<p>Reference table for the different SNR/CNR definitions based on a contrast.</p

Comparison in-term of classification accuracy while using Caltech-101 image dataset.

Nouman Ali (2836616)
Bushra Zafar (5352842)
Faisal Riaz (4482895)
Saadat Hanif Dar (5681471)
Naeem Iqbal Ratyal (5681474)
Khalid Bashir Bajwa (2697808)
Muhammad Kashif Iqbal (3830311)
Muhammad Sajid (710360)

September 2018

Comparison in-term of classification accuracy while using Caltech-101 image dataset.</p

Comparison of using different data compositions of synthetic images for training the classifier and then testing it on the 724 real images.

Rajkumar Theagarajan (6429590)
Bir Bhanu (2154277)

March 2019

Comparison of using different data compositions of synthetic images for training the classifier and ...

Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.

Frits A. Rangel (392221)
Thomas J. J. Maal (356232)
Ewald M. Bronkhorst (144659)
K. Hero Breuning (356233)
Jan G. J. H. Schols (392222)
Stefaan J. Bergé (144662)
Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman (144666)

March 2013

<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p

Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.

Wei Zheng (25452)
Xiaoya Zhang (744862)
Qi Lu (143184)

May 2015

<p>Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.</p

Standardized difference (SD) between C.L.I.M.B.<sup>a</sup> and comparison in the pre- and post-period respectively.

Zhehui Luo (419925)
Canopy Roychoudhury (14266171)
William S. Pompos (14266174)
James DiMaria (14266177)
Cynthia M. Robinette (14266180)
Purva H. Gore (14266183)
Rohon Roychoudhury (14266186)
William Beecroft (14266189)

December 2022

Standardized difference (SD) between C.L.I.M.B.a and comparison in the pre- and post-period respecti...

Comparison of the estimated PIC values calculated for the two different marker systems, TBP and SSR.

Floriana Gavazzi (3127005)
Luca Braglia (3126996)
Francesco Mastromauro (3126999)
Silvia Gianì (3127002)
Laura Morello (3127008)
Diego Breviario (3127011)

September 2016

<p>Comparison of the estimated PIC values calculated for the two different marker systems, TBP and S...

Comparisons of the characteristics of the seven different types of 2D barcodes.

Chang Liu (35901)
Linchun Shi (120476)
Xiaolan Xu (166867)
Huan Li (120482)
Hang Xing (166876)
Dong Liang (120479)
Kun Jiang (166885)
Xiaohui Pang (108739)
Jingyuan Song (108742)
Shilin Chen (85587)

May 2012

<p>Comparisons of the characteristics of the seven different types of 2D barcodes.</p

Anatomical structures evaluated in image quality assessment for the different sequences.

Mads Andersen (3498599)
Isabella M. Björkman-Burtscher (6324371)
Anouk Marsman (6710930)
Esben Thade Petersen (6710933)
Vincent Oltman Boer (6710936)

May 2019

Anatomical structures evaluated in image quality assessment for the different sequences.</p

Comparisons of the prosthesis type used between the severe group and the moderate group.

Seung Ah Lee (342223)
Seung-Baik Kang (4922665)
Chong Bum Chang (5848382)
Moon Jong Chang (4114618)
Young Jun Kim (844626)
Min Kyu Song (5848385)
Jin Hwa Jeong (5848388)

October 2018

Comparisons of the prosthesis type used between the severe group and the moderate group.</p

Comparison of ISS from manual coding versus ISS from automated conversion by categories.

Rebeca Abajas-Bustillo (6655607)
Francisco José Amo-Setién (3625700)
César Leal-Costa (6655610)
María del Carmen Ortego-Mate (6655613)
María Seguí-Gómez (6655616)
María Jesús Durá-Ros (6655619)
Mark R. Zonfrillo (3096264)

May 2019

Comparison of ISS from manual coding versus ISS from automated conversion by categories.</p

Comparison of the reference values provided by manufacturer and by our research.

Zhongjuan Liu (3211344)
Chuiwen Deng (611176)
Ping Li (31981)
Jingxia Wang (692422)
Lijuan Ma (4335364)
Yongzhe Li (528191)
Yingchun Xu (320157)

March 2018

<p>Comparison of the reference values provided by manufacturer and by our research.</p

Comparison of CEUS parameters between the different gastric lesions (P value).

Tingting Li (10553)
Man Lu (477856)
Jun Song (19318)
Ping Wu (46628)
Xueqing Cheng (3229950)
Zhenqi Zhang (1707127)

August 2017

<p>Comparison of CEUS parameters between the different gastric lesions (P value).</p

Comparison of classification accuracy while using different sizes of vocabulary.

Nouman Ali (2836616)
Bushra Zafar (5352842)
Faisal Riaz (4482895)
Saadat Hanif Dar (5681471)
Naeem Iqbal Ratyal (5681474)
Khalid Bashir Bajwa (2697808)
Muhammad Kashif Iqbal (3830311)
Muhammad Sajid (710360)

September 2018

Comparison of classification accuracy while using different sizes of vocabulary.</p

Comparison of singular values of <i>C</i> and <i>A</i> of 512 × 512 image.

Ying Li (38224)
Musheng Wei (3812512)
Fengxia Zhang (115332)
Jianli Zhao (584000)

March 2017

<p>Comparison of singular values of <i>C</i> and <i>A</i> of 512 × 512 image.</p

Reference table for the different SNR/CNR definitions based on a contrast.

Marijke Welvaert (480915)
Yves Rosseel (480916)

November 2013

<p>Reference table for the different SNR/CNR definitions based on a contrast.</p

Comparison in-term of classification accuracy while using Caltech-101 image dataset.

Nouman Ali (2836616)
Bushra Zafar (5352842)
Faisal Riaz (4482895)
Saadat Hanif Dar (5681471)
Naeem Iqbal Ratyal (5681474)
Khalid Bashir Bajwa (2697808)
Muhammad Kashif Iqbal (3830311)
Muhammad Sajid (710360)

September 2018

Comparison in-term of classification accuracy while using Caltech-101 image dataset.</p

Comparison of using different data compositions of synthetic images for training the classifier and then testing it on the 724 real images.

Rajkumar Theagarajan (6429590)
Bir Bhanu (2154277)

March 2019

Comparison of using different data compositions of synthetic images for training the classifier and ...