We present three approaches to belief base revision, which are examined also in the case in which the sentences in the base are partitioned between those which can and those which cannot be changed; the approaches are shown to be semantically equivalent. A new approach is then presented, based on the modification of individual rules, instead of deletion. The resulting base is semantically equivalent to that generated by the other approaches, in the sense that it has the same models, but the rule part alone has less models, that is, is subjected to a smaller change
AbstractThe area of belief revision studies how a rational agent may incorporate new information abo...
this paper, we adopt the former perspective. In order to distinguish operations on syntactic descrip...
. The theory of belief revision developed by Gardenfors and his colleagues characterizes the classes...
We present three approaches to revision of belief bases, which are also examined in the case in whic...
A minimal approach to modelling belief change is presented, wherein arguably all successful belief c...
Since the early 1980s, logical theories of belief revision have offered formal methods for the tran...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
AbstractThis paper presents a general, consistency-based framework for expressing belief change. The...
This paper proposes a method for handling logically conflicting inputs into knowledge bases. Basical...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
AbstractSince the early 1980s, logical theories of belief revision have offered formal methods for t...
Belief revision semantics appear promising as a definition for the meaning of updates to logical kno...
We live in an era of data and information, where an immeasurable amount of discoveries, findings, ev...
Abstract. We propose a new operation of belief revision, called per-missive belief revision. The und...
AbstractThe area of belief revision studies how a rational agent may incorporate new information abo...
this paper, we adopt the former perspective. In order to distinguish operations on syntactic descrip...
. The theory of belief revision developed by Gardenfors and his colleagues characterizes the classes...
We present three approaches to revision of belief bases, which are also examined in the case in whic...
A minimal approach to modelling belief change is presented, wherein arguably all successful belief c...
Since the early 1980s, logical theories of belief revision have offered formal methods for the tran...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
AbstractThis paper presents a general, consistency-based framework for expressing belief change. The...
This paper proposes a method for handling logically conflicting inputs into knowledge bases. Basical...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
Belief Revision systems are logical frameworks to modeling the dynamics of knowledge. That is, how t...
AbstractSince the early 1980s, logical theories of belief revision have offered formal methods for t...
Belief revision semantics appear promising as a definition for the meaning of updates to logical kno...
We live in an era of data and information, where an immeasurable amount of discoveries, findings, ev...
Abstract. We propose a new operation of belief revision, called per-missive belief revision. The und...
AbstractThe area of belief revision studies how a rational agent may incorporate new information abo...
this paper, we adopt the former perspective. In order to distinguish operations on syntactic descrip...
. The theory of belief revision developed by Gardenfors and his colleagues characterizes the classes...