Ask
Search
My library
ORKG

ORKG Ask

Our mission is to organize scholarly knowledge and make it accessible to humans and machines.

About

About ORKG Ask
Report issue
Statistics
Contact

Legal

Terms of use
Data protection (sheet)
Imprint
Accessibility
License

Technical

We
open source
System status
Changelog
Frontend: v1.41.0
Backend: v1.13.4

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

Appendix D. Additional information on the gradients realized through the lake-selection procedure.

S. Declerck (2913887)
J. Vandekerkhove (2913878)
L. Johansson (2913920)
K. Muylaert (1545736)
J. M. Conde-Porcuna (2913917)
K. Van der Gucht (2913902)
C. Pérez-Martínez (2913905)
T. Lauridsen (2913908)
K. Schwenk (2913890)
G. Zwart (2913893)
W. Rommens (2913911)
J. López-Ramos (2913884)
E. Jeppesen (2913914)
W. Vyverman (2913896)
L. Brendonck (2913899)
L. De Meester (2913881)

Publication date

August 2016

DOI

10.6084/m9.figshare.3524888.v1

Abstract

Additional information on the gradients realized through the lake-selection procedure

Extracted data

Related items

Appendix E. Additional GAMs including only Daphnia and Bosmina taxa in the response variable for the three lakes.

Benjamin Alric (2927013)
Jean-Philippe Jenny (1680163)
Vincent Berthon (1388781)
Fabien Arnaud (1680166)
Cecile Pignol (2927022)
Jean-Louis Reyss (2927016)
Pierre Sabatier (2927019)
Marie-Elodie Perga (1548796)

August 2016

Additional GAMs including only Daphnia and Bosmina taxa in the response variable for the three lakes

Appendix E: Central Sands Lakes Study Technical Memorandum: General Lake Model

Pruitt, Aaron

May 2021

This appendix provides documentation for the General Lake Model used for verifying lake evaporation ...

Appendix C. Details of statistical analyses to compare carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures between lakes, treatments, and seasons.

K. Scharnweber (2927688)
J. Syväranta (2927676)
S. Hilt (2927685)
M. Brauns (2927682)
M. J. Vanni (2927667)
S. Brothers (2927673)
J. Köhler (2738410)
J. Knežević-Jarić (2927670)
T. Mehner (2927679)

August 2016

Details of statistical analyses to compare carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures between lakes, tre...

Appendix E. A table showing select physical and chemical characteristics of the 17 study lakes, along with the percentage relative abundance of the three target species in surface sediment samples.

Jasmine E. Saros (250782)
Jeffery R. Stone (639225)
Gregory T. Pederson (837821)
Krista E. H. Slemmons (2924697)
Trisha Spanbauer (2924691)
Anna Schliep (2924694)
Douglas Cahl (2924700)
Craig E. Williamson (2288485)
Daniel R. Engstrom (813021)

August 2016

A table showing select physical and chemical characteristics of the 17 study lakes, along with the p...

Appendix D. Results of SIMPER analyses identifying the five taxa contributing most to the dissimilarity between nutrient-poor and nutrient-rich lakes and indicating the relative changes in the abundance of each taxon in lakes of differing trophic status.

Ian Donohue (331956)
Andrew L. Jackson (331957)
Martin T. Pusch (2918735)
Kenneth Irvine (740512)

August 2016

Results of SIMPER analyses identifying the five taxa contributing most to the dissimilarity between ...

Appendix C. Results of PERMANOVA analyses examining the effects of lake alkalinity and trophic status on the relative variability of the spatial distances among lakes sampled for invertebrates.

Ian Donohue (331956)
Andrew L. Jackson (331957)
Martin T. Pusch (2918735)
Kenneth Irvine (740512)

August 2016

Results of PERMANOVA analyses examining the effects of lake alkalinity and trophic status on the rel...

Appendix B. A mathematical proof of how selection gradients estimated with traits standardized and fitness relativized within treatments can be transformed into selection gradients estimated with traits standardized and fitness relativized across treatments.

Casey P. terHorst (2919020)
Jennifer A. Lau (2914184)
Idelle A. Cooper (2929794)
Kane R. Keller (2929797)
Raffica J. La Rosa (2929803)
Anne M. Royer (601847)
Elizabeth H. Schultheis (2929806)
Tomomi Suwa (2929800)
Jeffrey K. Conner (2929791)

August 2016

A mathematical proof of how selection gradients estimated with traits standardized and fitness relat...

Appendix A. Means and ranges of limnological variables measured in the study ponds and lakes over the survey period.

Erica A. Garcia (2914328)
Gary G. Mittelbach (2912393)

August 2016

Means and ranges of limnological variables measured in the study ponds and lakes over the survey per...

Appendix A. A description of methods used to determine physical and chemical parameters at high- and low-gradient survey sites and a table showing additional physical parameters at high-gradient sites.

Effie A. Greathouse (2904044)
Catherine M. Pringle (2904041)
William H. McDowell (483444)
Jeff G. Holmquist (2904038)

August 2016

A description of methods used to determine physical and chemical parameters at high- and low-gradien...

Appendix A. Environmental characteristics and location of each study site along the latitudinal gradient.

Thomas J. Mozdzer (300755)
Karen J. McGlathery (190605)
Aaron L. Mills (2928399)
Joseph C. Zieman (387727)

August 2016

Environmental characteristics and location of each study site along the latitudinal gradient

Appendix B. Computational details of the null model showing that lakes within watersheds are more connected than across watersheds.

Renato Henriques-Silva (2925261)
Zoë Lindo (2925264)
Pedro R. Peres-Neto (498761)

August 2016

Computational details of the null model showing that lakes within watersheds are more connected than...

Appendix A. Locality map and pictures of two locations at extremes of the water quality gradient.

S Uthicke (2923635)
F Patel (2923632)
R Ditchburn (2923629)

August 2016

Locality map and pictures of two locations at extremes of the water quality gradient

Appendix A. A summary of chemical and physical data for the five source lakes that contributed dispersers for this study and for mesocosms averaged across weeks of the experiment, and a graph illustrating the first two axes of a principle coordinates analysis of the plankton communities across the three dispersal treatments using compositional data collected on the last day of the experiment.

Brandon S. Schamp (497231)
Shelley E. Arnott (2907266)
Katelyn L. Joslin (2929041)

August 2016

A summary of chemical and physical data for the five source lakes that contributed dispersers for th...

Appendix A. Pictures of each of the sites along the successional gradient, taken in the summer of July 2008.

Maarten Schrama (2924811)
Matty P. Berg (2916599)
Han Olff (143646)

August 2016

Pictures of each of the sites along the successional gradient, taken in the summer of July 2008

Appendix C. A depiction of phosphorus loadings as function of P (P in lake) and M (P in mud) for three different discount rates.

Donald Ludwig (2903285)
Steve Carpenter (2903282)
W. Brock (2903288)

August 2016

A depiction of phosphorus loadings as function of P (P in lake) and M (P in mud) for three different...

Appendix E. Additional GAMs including only Daphnia and Bosmina taxa in the response variable for the three lakes.

Benjamin Alric (2927013)
Jean-Philippe Jenny (1680163)
Vincent Berthon (1388781)
Fabien Arnaud (1680166)
Cecile Pignol (2927022)
Jean-Louis Reyss (2927016)
Pierre Sabatier (2927019)
Marie-Elodie Perga (1548796)

August 2016

Additional GAMs including only Daphnia and Bosmina taxa in the response variable for the three lakes

Appendix E: Central Sands Lakes Study Technical Memorandum: General Lake Model

Pruitt, Aaron

May 2021

This appendix provides documentation for the General Lake Model used for verifying lake evaporation ...

Appendix C. Details of statistical analyses to compare carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures between lakes, treatments, and seasons.

K. Scharnweber (2927688)
J. Syväranta (2927676)
S. Hilt (2927685)
M. Brauns (2927682)
M. J. Vanni (2927667)
S. Brothers (2927673)
J. Köhler (2738410)
J. Knežević-Jarić (2927670)
T. Mehner (2927679)

August 2016

Details of statistical analyses to compare carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures between lakes, tre...

Appendix E. A table showing select physical and chemical characteristics of the 17 study lakes, along with the percentage relative abundance of the three target species in surface sediment samples.

Jasmine E. Saros (250782)
Jeffery R. Stone (639225)
Gregory T. Pederson (837821)
Krista E. H. Slemmons (2924697)
Trisha Spanbauer (2924691)
Anna Schliep (2924694)
Douglas Cahl (2924700)
Craig E. Williamson (2288485)
Daniel R. Engstrom (813021)

August 2016

A table showing select physical and chemical characteristics of the 17 study lakes, along with the p...

Appendix D. Results of SIMPER analyses identifying the five taxa contributing most to the dissimilarity between nutrient-poor and nutrient-rich lakes and indicating the relative changes in the abundance of each taxon in lakes of differing trophic status.

Ian Donohue (331956)
Andrew L. Jackson (331957)
Martin T. Pusch (2918735)
Kenneth Irvine (740512)

August 2016

Results of SIMPER analyses identifying the five taxa contributing most to the dissimilarity between ...

Appendix C. Results of PERMANOVA analyses examining the effects of lake alkalinity and trophic status on the relative variability of the spatial distances among lakes sampled for invertebrates.

Ian Donohue (331956)
Andrew L. Jackson (331957)
Martin T. Pusch (2918735)
Kenneth Irvine (740512)

August 2016

Results of PERMANOVA analyses examining the effects of lake alkalinity and trophic status on the rel...

Appendix B. A mathematical proof of how selection gradients estimated with traits standardized and fitness relativized within treatments can be transformed into selection gradients estimated with traits standardized and fitness relativized across treatments.

Casey P. terHorst (2919020)
Jennifer A. Lau (2914184)
Idelle A. Cooper (2929794)
Kane R. Keller (2929797)
Raffica J. La Rosa (2929803)
Anne M. Royer (601847)
Elizabeth H. Schultheis (2929806)
Tomomi Suwa (2929800)
Jeffrey K. Conner (2929791)

August 2016

A mathematical proof of how selection gradients estimated with traits standardized and fitness relat...

Appendix A. Means and ranges of limnological variables measured in the study ponds and lakes over the survey period.

Erica A. Garcia (2914328)
Gary G. Mittelbach (2912393)

August 2016

Means and ranges of limnological variables measured in the study ponds and lakes over the survey per...

Appendix A. A description of methods used to determine physical and chemical parameters at high- and low-gradient survey sites and a table showing additional physical parameters at high-gradient sites.

Effie A. Greathouse (2904044)
Catherine M. Pringle (2904041)
William H. McDowell (483444)
Jeff G. Holmquist (2904038)

August 2016

A description of methods used to determine physical and chemical parameters at high- and low-gradien...

Appendix A. Environmental characteristics and location of each study site along the latitudinal gradient.

Thomas J. Mozdzer (300755)
Karen J. McGlathery (190605)
Aaron L. Mills (2928399)
Joseph C. Zieman (387727)

August 2016

Environmental characteristics and location of each study site along the latitudinal gradient

Appendix B. Computational details of the null model showing that lakes within watersheds are more connected than across watersheds.

Renato Henriques-Silva (2925261)
Zoë Lindo (2925264)
Pedro R. Peres-Neto (498761)

August 2016

Computational details of the null model showing that lakes within watersheds are more connected than...

Appendix A. Locality map and pictures of two locations at extremes of the water quality gradient.

S Uthicke (2923635)
F Patel (2923632)
R Ditchburn (2923629)

August 2016

Locality map and pictures of two locations at extremes of the water quality gradient

Appendix A. A summary of chemical and physical data for the five source lakes that contributed dispersers for this study and for mesocosms averaged across weeks of the experiment, and a graph illustrating the first two axes of a principle coordinates analysis of the plankton communities across the three dispersal treatments using compositional data collected on the last day of the experiment.

Brandon S. Schamp (497231)
Shelley E. Arnott (2907266)
Katelyn L. Joslin (2929041)

August 2016

A summary of chemical and physical data for the five source lakes that contributed dispersers for th...

Appendix A. Pictures of each of the sites along the successional gradient, taken in the summer of July 2008.

Maarten Schrama (2924811)
Matty P. Berg (2916599)
Han Olff (143646)

August 2016

Pictures of each of the sites along the successional gradient, taken in the summer of July 2008

Appendix C. A depiction of phosphorus loadings as function of P (P in lake) and M (P in mud) for three different discount rates.

Donald Ludwig (2903285)
Steve Carpenter (2903282)
W. Brock (2903288)

August 2016

A depiction of phosphorus loadings as function of P (P in lake) and M (P in mud) for three different...

Appendix E. Additional GAMs including only Daphnia and Bosmina taxa in the response variable for the three lakes.

Benjamin Alric (2927013)
Jean-Philippe Jenny (1680163)
Vincent Berthon (1388781)
Fabien Arnaud (1680166)
Cecile Pignol (2927022)
Jean-Louis Reyss (2927016)
Pierre Sabatier (2927019)
Marie-Elodie Perga (1548796)

August 2016

Additional GAMs including only Daphnia and Bosmina taxa in the response variable for the three lakes

Appendix E: Central Sands Lakes Study Technical Memorandum: General Lake Model

Pruitt, Aaron

May 2021

This appendix provides documentation for the General Lake Model used for verifying lake evaporation ...

Appendix C. Details of statistical analyses to compare carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures between lakes, treatments, and seasons.

K. Scharnweber (2927688)
J. Syväranta (2927676)
S. Hilt (2927685)
M. Brauns (2927682)
M. J. Vanni (2927667)
S. Brothers (2927673)
J. Köhler (2738410)
J. Knežević-Jarić (2927670)
T. Mehner (2927679)

August 2016

Details of statistical analyses to compare carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures between lakes, tre...