<p>Cutoff Values and Performance of TE Measurement for the Diagnosis of Fibrosis Stage.</p
<p>The predictors for high LS value (>5.33kPa) which is the cutoff value for differentiating advance...
<p>Receiver operating characteristic curves of serum HBsAg levels in predicting insignificant fibros...
<p>Mean FT values increase significantly as fibrosis stage increase (0.17 for F1 (range, 0.02–0.92),...
<p>Standard cut-off values of non-invasive tests of liver fibrosis in the literature.</p
<p>Diagnostic accuracy (PPV, NPV, Se, Sp) of indirect (Forns, APRI, FIB-4) and direct (ELF) scores (...
<p>Area under the curve and optimal cut off results for TE discriminating different fibrosis stages ...
<p>Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility for prediction of fibrosis in validation group.</p
<p>Cut-off values and the classification of patients on the basis of the NAFLD fibrosis score (n = 1...
Diagnostic performance of WMH volume for differentiating Fazekas scale with its cut-off values.</p
<p>LS, liver stiffness; FT, FibroTest; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristics curv...
<p>Application of published cut-off values for TE (7.9 kPa) and CAP (252 dB/m<sup>2</sup>) results i...
<p>Diagnostic performance of the different imaging parameters using the proposed cut-offs* for the p...
<p>Cutoff values were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p>Predict...
<p>Diagnostic Accuracy of FibroTest for the Prediction of Significant Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Vari...
Comparisons of characteristics of fibrosis stages by FIB-4 or transient elastogrpahy.</p
<p>The predictors for high LS value (>5.33kPa) which is the cutoff value for differentiating advance...
<p>Receiver operating characteristic curves of serum HBsAg levels in predicting insignificant fibros...
<p>Mean FT values increase significantly as fibrosis stage increase (0.17 for F1 (range, 0.02–0.92),...
<p>Standard cut-off values of non-invasive tests of liver fibrosis in the literature.</p
<p>Diagnostic accuracy (PPV, NPV, Se, Sp) of indirect (Forns, APRI, FIB-4) and direct (ELF) scores (...
<p>Area under the curve and optimal cut off results for TE discriminating different fibrosis stages ...
<p>Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility for prediction of fibrosis in validation group.</p
<p>Cut-off values and the classification of patients on the basis of the NAFLD fibrosis score (n = 1...
Diagnostic performance of WMH volume for differentiating Fazekas scale with its cut-off values.</p
<p>LS, liver stiffness; FT, FibroTest; AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristics curv...
<p>Application of published cut-off values for TE (7.9 kPa) and CAP (252 dB/m<sup>2</sup>) results i...
<p>Diagnostic performance of the different imaging parameters using the proposed cut-offs* for the p...
<p>Cutoff values were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.</p><p>Predict...
<p>Diagnostic Accuracy of FibroTest for the Prediction of Significant Fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Vari...
Comparisons of characteristics of fibrosis stages by FIB-4 or transient elastogrpahy.</p
<p>The predictors for high LS value (>5.33kPa) which is the cutoff value for differentiating advance...
<p>Receiver operating characteristic curves of serum HBsAg levels in predicting insignificant fibros...
<p>Mean FT values increase significantly as fibrosis stage increase (0.17 for F1 (range, 0.02–0.92),...