Error Rate Results of Experiment 1.

Error rate (M, SD in %) in Experiments 1–4 as a function of key distance (close, far) and Stroop congruency (congruent, incongruent, neutral).

Melanie Jonas (336028)
Owino Eloka (538867)
Julia Stephan (538868)
Volker H. Franz (538869)

March 2014

Error rate (M, SD in %) in Experiments 1–4 as a function of key distance (close, far) and Stroop ...

Decomposing the Garner interference paradigm: Evidence for dissociations between macro- and micro-level performance

Dyson, Benjamin J
Quinlan, Philip T

August 2010

Three Garner interference experiments are described in which baseline, filtering, and correlated per...

The figure shows the results from Experiment 1.

Anatole Nöstl (299829)
John E. Marsh (299831)
Patrik Sörqvist (299833)

February 2013

Each visual target was preceded by one of three standard tones that together formed a repetitive ...

Reaction Time Results of Experiment 1.

Rodica Ghinescu (3394460)
Todd R. Schachtman (3394454)
Ashley K. Ramsey (3394457)
Gabriele Gratton (357629)
Monica Fabiani (357628)

December 2016

The figure illustrates the results of Experiment 1 regarding the noise compatibility effect on re...

Single comparisons of the error rates for compatible and incompatible trials per proficiency group.

Daniela Katharina Ahlberg (4962124)
Heike Bischoff (4962121)
Jessica Vanessa Strozyk (4962118)
Doreen Bryant (4962115)
Barbara Kaup (383073)

March 2018

Single comparisons of the error rates for compatible and incompatible trials per proficiency grou...

An Optimization Study on Listening Experiments to Improve the Comparability of Annoyance Ratings of Noise Samples from Different Experimental Sample Sets

Guoqing Di

March 2018

Annoyance ratings obtained from listening experiments are widely used in studies on health effect of...

Individual comparisons of the error rates for compatible and incompatible trials per language group.

Daniela Katharina Ahlberg (4962124)
Heike Bischoff (4962121)
Jessica Vanessa Strozyk (4962118)
Doreen Bryant (4962115)
Barbara Kaup (383073)

March 2018

Individual comparisons of the error rates for compatible and incompatible trials per language gro...

Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2.

Dorottya Rusz (5819774)
Erik Bijleveld (177088)
Michiel A. J. Kompier (2586820)

October 2018

Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 1.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

The Effects of a Conflicting Instruction on a Fr 5 Performance

Koremura, Yuka

May 2001

The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of a conflicting instruction on FR-5 perf...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 2.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

Compatibility effects in accuracy rates (percent) as a function of set size, exposure duration, and culture; values in brackets represent standard error.

Jan W. de Fockert (309686)
Serge Caparos (341478)
Karina J. Linnell (341479)
Jules Davidoff (341480)

February 2013

Compatibility effects in accuracy rates (percent) as a function of set size, exposure duration, a...

Testing the models: Simulated vs. observed effect of comparator noise on test performance.

Leo C. McHugh (6725777)
Kevin Snyder (6725780)
Thomas D. Yager (835027)

May 2019

Testing the models: Simulated vs. observed effect of comparator noise on test performance.</p

Graphs of trials to learn by trial type and error rate by trial type and learning condition.

Kyle K. Morgan (655846)
Phan Luu (366573)
Don M. Tucker (366581)

April 2016

(Left) On average, Go stimuli took significantly longer to learn than No Go stimuli. (Right) Erro...

Performance across learning conditions and random wiring seeds.

George L. Chadderdon (302114)
Samuel A. Neymotin (302116)
Cliff C. Kerr (302117)
William W. Lytton (302118)

February 2013

A. End-of-trial errors under different learning conditions: no learning, reward-only, punisher-on...

Error rate (M, SD in %) in Experiments 1–4 as a function of key distance (close, far) and Stroop congruency (congruent, incongruent, neutral).

Melanie Jonas (336028)
Owino Eloka (538867)
Julia Stephan (538868)
Volker H. Franz (538869)

March 2014

Error rate (M, SD in %) in Experiments 1–4 as a function of key distance (close, far) and Stroop ...

Decomposing the Garner interference paradigm: Evidence for dissociations between macro- and micro-level performance

Dyson, Benjamin J
Quinlan, Philip T

August 2010

Three Garner interference experiments are described in which baseline, filtering, and correlated per...

The figure shows the results from Experiment 1.

Anatole Nöstl (299829)
John E. Marsh (299831)
Patrik Sörqvist (299833)

February 2013

Each visual target was preceded by one of three standard tones that together formed a repetitive ...

Reaction Time Results of Experiment 1.

Rodica Ghinescu (3394460)
Todd R. Schachtman (3394454)
Ashley K. Ramsey (3394457)
Gabriele Gratton (357629)
Monica Fabiani (357628)

December 2016

The figure illustrates the results of Experiment 1 regarding the noise compatibility effect on re...

Single comparisons of the error rates for compatible and incompatible trials per proficiency group.

Daniela Katharina Ahlberg (4962124)
Heike Bischoff (4962121)
Jessica Vanessa Strozyk (4962118)
Doreen Bryant (4962115)
Barbara Kaup (383073)

March 2018

Single comparisons of the error rates for compatible and incompatible trials per proficiency grou...

An Optimization Study on Listening Experiments to Improve the Comparability of Annoyance Ratings of Noise Samples from Different Experimental Sample Sets

Guoqing Di

March 2018

Annoyance ratings obtained from listening experiments are widely used in studies on health effect of...

Individual comparisons of the error rates for compatible and incompatible trials per language group.

Daniela Katharina Ahlberg (4962124)
Heike Bischoff (4962121)
Jessica Vanessa Strozyk (4962118)
Doreen Bryant (4962115)
Barbara Kaup (383073)

March 2018

Individual comparisons of the error rates for compatible and incompatible trials per language gro...

Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2.

Dorottya Rusz (5819774)
Erik Bijleveld (177088)
Michiel A. J. Kompier (2586820)

October 2018

Results of the experimental effects on accuracy and performance variability both in Experiment 1 and...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 1.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

The Effects of a Conflicting Instruction on a Fr 5 Performance

Koremura, Yuka

May 2001

The purpose of this experiment was to evaluate the effects of a conflicting instruction on FR-5 perf...

Mean Error Rates (Percent Incorrect) for Experiment 2.

Zhe Chen (196097)
Yei-Yu Yeh (413042)

May 2013

Note: SS: the relevant-same-irrelevant-same condition; SD: the relevant-same-irrelevant-different...

Compatibility effects in accuracy rates (percent) as a function of set size, exposure duration, and culture; values in brackets represent standard error.

Jan W. de Fockert (309686)
Serge Caparos (341478)
Karina J. Linnell (341479)
Jules Davidoff (341480)

February 2013

Compatibility effects in accuracy rates (percent) as a function of set size, exposure duration, a...

Testing the models: Simulated vs. observed effect of comparator noise on test performance.

Leo C. McHugh (6725777)
Kevin Snyder (6725780)
Thomas D. Yager (835027)

May 2019

Testing the models: Simulated vs. observed effect of comparator noise on test performance.</p

Graphs of trials to learn by trial type and error rate by trial type and learning condition.

Kyle K. Morgan (655846)
Phan Luu (366573)
Don M. Tucker (366581)

April 2016

(Left) On average, Go stimuli took significantly longer to learn than No Go stimuli. (Right) Erro...

Performance across learning conditions and random wiring seeds.

George L. Chadderdon (302114)
Samuel A. Neymotin (302116)
Cliff C. Kerr (302117)
William W. Lytton (302118)

February 2013

A. End-of-trial errors under different learning conditions: no learning, reward-only, punisher-on...

Error rate (M, SD in %) in Experiments 1–4 as a function of key distance (close, far) and Stroop congruency (congruent, incongruent, neutral).

Melanie Jonas (336028)
Owino Eloka (538867)
Julia Stephan (538868)
Volker H. Franz (538869)

March 2014

Error rate (M, SD in %) in Experiments 1–4 as a function of key distance (close, far) and Stroop ...

Decomposing the Garner interference paradigm: Evidence for dissociations between macro- and micro-level performance

Dyson, Benjamin J
Quinlan, Philip T

August 2010

Three Garner interference experiments are described in which baseline, filtering, and correlated per...

The figure shows the results from Experiment 1.

Anatole Nöstl (299829)
John E. Marsh (299831)
Patrik Sörqvist (299833)

February 2013

Each visual target was preceded by one of three standard tones that together formed a repetitive ...

Error Rate Results of Experiment 1.

Abstract

Extracted data

Error Rate Results of Experiment 1.

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items