<p>Comparison between our scheme and some typical (<i>k</i>, <i>n</i>)-SIS schemes.</p
Comparison of the classification performance by the proposed network and other methods.</p
<p>Computational times and accuracy comparisons of various algorithms on Schemes 1–4.</p
Comparison of closeness coefficients of the three schemes under different evaluation coefficient μ.<...
<p>A comparison between our proposed scheme and 10,000 randomly produced schemes.</p
The average performance comparison of the proposed scheme with other schemes for different values of...
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
<p>The comparisons among different schemes under different numbers of antennas and users.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
Comparison between numerical simulation results and standard calculation results (kN).</p
<p>Performance comparison and relative gain of the proposed scheme over the existing schemes.</p
<p>Note: Here, we use the number of elements of groups to represent the public key size and cipherte...
Comparison of the computational cost between the proposed scheme and other 3PAKE schemes.</p
<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...
<p>Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers...
Comparison of closeness coefficients of the three schemes under different evaluation coefficients α....
Comparison of the classification performance by the proposed network and other methods.</p
<p>Computational times and accuracy comparisons of various algorithms on Schemes 1–4.</p
Comparison of closeness coefficients of the three schemes under different evaluation coefficient μ.<...
<p>A comparison between our proposed scheme and 10,000 randomly produced schemes.</p
The average performance comparison of the proposed scheme with other schemes for different values of...
<p>Comparison of our approach and counterpart algorithms in terms of running time (<i>s</i>).</p
<p>The comparisons among different schemes under different numbers of antennas and users.</p
Comparison of performance obtained by our approach with other state-of-the-art algorithms.</p
Comparison between numerical simulation results and standard calculation results (kN).</p
<p>Performance comparison and relative gain of the proposed scheme over the existing schemes.</p
<p>Note: Here, we use the number of elements of groups to represent the public key size and cipherte...
Comparison of the computational cost between the proposed scheme and other 3PAKE schemes.</p
<p>Comparison of the proposed algorithm with the state of the art methods available in literature.</...
<p>Comparison of the average classification accuracies of different algorithms for different numbers...
Comparison of closeness coefficients of the three schemes under different evaluation coefficients α....
Comparison of the classification performance by the proposed network and other methods.</p
<p>Computational times and accuracy comparisons of various algorithms on Schemes 1–4.</p
Comparison of closeness coefficients of the three schemes under different evaluation coefficient μ.<...
DOI
Add to ORKG