<p>(A) Cutoff criteria of expression changes of ≤3-fold. (B) Cutoff criteria of expression changes of ≤4-fold. (C) Cutoff criteria of expression changes of ≤5-fold.</p
<p>The left group represents hits from the initial screening with uncorrected p-value of ≤0.01 vs. u...
<p>Number of differently expressed genes with a cut-off of q = 10% in all comparisons of worker phen...
<p>(A) Calculation of e-ΔCT, an extension of the ΔCT-method by first calculating the mean CT-value o...
Fold change of gene expression at 1M, 3M and 6M of ART, for the genes that showed significant change...
<p>(A) Log-fold changes in gene expression in WS6 vs MS6. (B) Log-fold changes in gene expression in...
<p>a. Genes whose expression was increased by MI but reduced or normalized by T4 treatment; b. Genes...
Genes (shown in Fig 4) whose expression levels changed significantly in each treatment sample are in...
<p>Modulation of gene expression can be in the form of increased expression ...
<p>Sequential removal of the least stable reference gene improves average expression stability, indi...
<p>FC, fold change; h, hours; adjpBH, adjusted <i>P</i> value to which the α cutoff was applied.</p>...
<p>FC, fold change; h, hours; adjpBH, adjusted <i>P</i> value to which the α cutoff was applied.</p>...
<p>Low and high gene expression thresholds calculated by the improved K-means algorithm.</p
<p>Gene expression level was determined by calculating the number of unambiguous tags for each gene ...
<p>The top charts correspond to <i>E. granulosus</i> s.s. (G1), and the bottom charts correspond to ...
<p>Each curve reports the score of a Cox Proportional Hazards model associated with different cut-of...
<p>The left group represents hits from the initial screening with uncorrected p-value of ≤0.01 vs. u...
<p>Number of differently expressed genes with a cut-off of q = 10% in all comparisons of worker phen...
<p>(A) Calculation of e-ΔCT, an extension of the ΔCT-method by first calculating the mean CT-value o...
Fold change of gene expression at 1M, 3M and 6M of ART, for the genes that showed significant change...
<p>(A) Log-fold changes in gene expression in WS6 vs MS6. (B) Log-fold changes in gene expression in...
<p>a. Genes whose expression was increased by MI but reduced or normalized by T4 treatment; b. Genes...
Genes (shown in Fig 4) whose expression levels changed significantly in each treatment sample are in...
<p>Modulation of gene expression can be in the form of increased expression ...
<p>Sequential removal of the least stable reference gene improves average expression stability, indi...
<p>FC, fold change; h, hours; adjpBH, adjusted <i>P</i> value to which the α cutoff was applied.</p>...
<p>FC, fold change; h, hours; adjpBH, adjusted <i>P</i> value to which the α cutoff was applied.</p>...
<p>Low and high gene expression thresholds calculated by the improved K-means algorithm.</p
<p>Gene expression level was determined by calculating the number of unambiguous tags for each gene ...
<p>The top charts correspond to <i>E. granulosus</i> s.s. (G1), and the bottom charts correspond to ...
<p>Each curve reports the score of a Cox Proportional Hazards model associated with different cut-of...
<p>The left group represents hits from the initial screening with uncorrected p-value of ≤0.01 vs. u...
<p>Number of differently expressed genes with a cut-off of q = 10% in all comparisons of worker phen...
<p>(A) Calculation of e-ΔCT, an extension of the ΔCT-method by first calculating the mean CT-value o...
DOI
Add to ORKG