<p>3T3-CXCR4/US27 cells were treated with 100 ng/ml CXCL12 or PBS for the indicated times, harvested, and then labeled with membrane impermeable fluorogen and analyzed via flow cytometry. (A) αRED fluorescence labeling of surface US27. (B) Fluorescence intensity pre-treatment was set as 100% and intensity at each time point expressed as % initial level. (C) αRED labeling of surface CXCR4 and (D) percent total initial surface levels calculated as above. Error bars represent standard error among three independent replicate experiments.</p
<p>(A) Mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) obtained with MOA serum of day 70 followed by staining wi...
<p>Membrane expression of CD54 (<i>P</i> = 0.033, *), CD11b (<i>P</i> = 0.031, §) and CD11c (<i>P</i...
<p>Erythrocytes were reacted with FITC-labeled Annexin-V. Subpopulations of AA (A) and CC (B) erythr...
<p>3T3-CXCR4/US27 cells were seeded in glass-bottom dishes, labeled with 100nM membrane impermeable ...
<p>(A) M9+glycerol. Fusion strains with (MLG910, light blue squares) and without RpoS (MLG-Δ<i>rpoS<...
<p>(A) Example of flow cytometry profiles used to assess the exposure/accessibility of cell wall com...
<p>Depicted are relative fluorescence units (RFU) of deenergized cells preloaded with 1,2′-DNA after...
<p>Cells were plated and induced as described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10...
<p>Transfection efficiency of PEG-Bu measured with flow cytometry in BRL-3A cells. A: fluorescence i...
<p>Cells of NPC1 line 93.59 were grown on glass cover slips, rinsed and treated as described below. ...
<p>The proportion of hyperfluorescent L929 cells is shown after control (n = 12 wells) or MPS (n = 8...
<p>Error bars for TAG concentration by <sup>1</sup>H NMR are calculated via propagation of uncertain...
<p>The molar concentration of (<i>A</i>) mEos2 and (<i>B</i>) mPlum is shown as a function of the in...
Supplemental Figure 4. Nanoscale flow cytometry controls. A) Batch experiments were performed in tri...
<p>Cybrid cell lines were stained with the fluorescent membrane potential indicator dye TMRE. The fl...
<p>(A) Mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) obtained with MOA serum of day 70 followed by staining wi...
<p>Membrane expression of CD54 (<i>P</i> = 0.033, *), CD11b (<i>P</i> = 0.031, §) and CD11c (<i>P</i...
<p>Erythrocytes were reacted with FITC-labeled Annexin-V. Subpopulations of AA (A) and CC (B) erythr...
<p>3T3-CXCR4/US27 cells were seeded in glass-bottom dishes, labeled with 100nM membrane impermeable ...
<p>(A) M9+glycerol. Fusion strains with (MLG910, light blue squares) and without RpoS (MLG-Δ<i>rpoS<...
<p>(A) Example of flow cytometry profiles used to assess the exposure/accessibility of cell wall com...
<p>Depicted are relative fluorescence units (RFU) of deenergized cells preloaded with 1,2′-DNA after...
<p>Cells were plated and induced as described in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10...
<p>Transfection efficiency of PEG-Bu measured with flow cytometry in BRL-3A cells. A: fluorescence i...
<p>Cells of NPC1 line 93.59 were grown on glass cover slips, rinsed and treated as described below. ...
<p>The proportion of hyperfluorescent L929 cells is shown after control (n = 12 wells) or MPS (n = 8...
<p>Error bars for TAG concentration by <sup>1</sup>H NMR are calculated via propagation of uncertain...
<p>The molar concentration of (<i>A</i>) mEos2 and (<i>B</i>) mPlum is shown as a function of the in...
Supplemental Figure 4. Nanoscale flow cytometry controls. A) Batch experiments were performed in tri...
<p>Cybrid cell lines were stained with the fluorescent membrane potential indicator dye TMRE. The fl...
<p>(A) Mean fluorescence intensities (MFI) obtained with MOA serum of day 70 followed by staining wi...
<p>Membrane expression of CD54 (<i>P</i> = 0.033, *), CD11b (<i>P</i> = 0.031, §) and CD11c (<i>P</i...
<p>Erythrocytes were reacted with FITC-labeled Annexin-V. Subpopulations of AA (A) and CC (B) erythr...