<p>Mean accuracy in each condition for the multiple object tracking (MOT) task shown in the top panel, and for the visual working memory (VWM) task in the bottom panel. Group analysis, to the far right in each panel, is consistent with previous research, however individual performance shows substantial variation, particularly in the MOT task. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.</p
<p>A) Group averaged mean performance across all testing blocks. B) Mean performance learning rates....
On average, participants gradually learned to choose outcomes correctly across six runs of scanned l...
<p>The dashed line shows the typical AOC space, so that the vertical line indicates MOT single task ...
<p>Panel A shows accuracy in terms of the mean number of identified targets. Performance drops with ...
Research in perception and attention has typically sought to evaluate cognitive mechanisms according...
<p><b>A</b>, Experimental approach of the working memory experiment (an exemplary trial of set size ...
<p>A: Experimental paradigms of the visual WM task. First, a sample array was presented for 100 ms o...
<p>(A) Performance for groups of trials that differ in how far off the cued direction the test direc...
(A) Group average of accuracy rates as a function of pixel noise, set size and location of the targe...
<p>(A) MOT task performance (i.e., fraction of correctly selected targets) as a function of attentio...
<p>The left column shows the accuracy (A) and RT (B) of the low-capacity group. The right column sho...
(A) Observers saw a brief sample display (250 ms) that contained 1 or 2 colored dots. After a delay ...
This thesis reports upon a series of seven experiments with three central and connected objectives. ...
<p>Data and fitted psychometric curves for a single subject (left) and group data (right). Data poin...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Accuracy was lower in trials with novel sounds in comparison to those with standard so...
<p>A) Group averaged mean performance across all testing blocks. B) Mean performance learning rates....
On average, participants gradually learned to choose outcomes correctly across six runs of scanned l...
<p>The dashed line shows the typical AOC space, so that the vertical line indicates MOT single task ...
<p>Panel A shows accuracy in terms of the mean number of identified targets. Performance drops with ...
Research in perception and attention has typically sought to evaluate cognitive mechanisms according...
<p><b>A</b>, Experimental approach of the working memory experiment (an exemplary trial of set size ...
<p>A: Experimental paradigms of the visual WM task. First, a sample array was presented for 100 ms o...
<p>(A) Performance for groups of trials that differ in how far off the cued direction the test direc...
(A) Group average of accuracy rates as a function of pixel noise, set size and location of the targe...
<p>(A) MOT task performance (i.e., fraction of correctly selected targets) as a function of attentio...
<p>The left column shows the accuracy (A) and RT (B) of the low-capacity group. The right column sho...
(A) Observers saw a brief sample display (250 ms) that contained 1 or 2 colored dots. After a delay ...
This thesis reports upon a series of seven experiments with three central and connected objectives. ...
<p>Data and fitted psychometric curves for a single subject (left) and group data (right). Data poin...
<p>(<b>a</b>) Accuracy was lower in trials with novel sounds in comparison to those with standard so...
<p>A) Group averaged mean performance across all testing blocks. B) Mean performance learning rates....
On average, participants gradually learned to choose outcomes correctly across six runs of scanned l...
<p>The dashed line shows the typical AOC space, so that the vertical line indicates MOT single task ...