<p>(A) the outside view of our resulting mesh; (B) the outside view of FSC mesh; (C) the cutaway view of our resulting mesh; (D) the cutaway view of FSC mesh.</p
Fig. 1: Visual analysis for mesh comparison. We propose YMCA, a system that combines explicit encodi...
Comparison of representative visibility level in experiments 0-3, consecutively at Fig 3 A-D.</p
The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two dat...
<p>Comparison among selected cases involving further modeling detail refinements.</p
<p>Comparison between model predicted skull geometry and segmented CT geometry.</p
<p>A comparison of the materials, methods and features that are used for the fabrication of scaffold...
The geometry and selected cells for optimization and comparison: (a) selected cells for comparison a...
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Comparisons of the input geometric parameters and extracted parameters in the simulation study.</p
<p>(a) Initial contour set by the CHT. (b) LBF. (c) CV. (d) NCV. (e) SMLV. (f) Ground truth.</p
<p>The comparisons of the true 3D feature points and the estimated 3D feature points of the first fr...
<p>Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.</p
Comparison between tilted plate and flat plate visualizing how results change based on angle.</p
(a) Degraded image; (b) First input image; (c) Second input image; (d) Third input image; (e) Ours.<...
The comparison between optimal cubic and cylindrical geometries for side and isometric views based o...
Fig. 1: Visual analysis for mesh comparison. We propose YMCA, a system that combines explicit encodi...
Comparison of representative visibility level in experiments 0-3, consecutively at Fig 3 A-D.</p
The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two dat...
<p>Comparison among selected cases involving further modeling detail refinements.</p
<p>Comparison between model predicted skull geometry and segmented CT geometry.</p
<p>A comparison of the materials, methods and features that are used for the fabrication of scaffold...
The geometry and selected cells for optimization and comparison: (a) selected cells for comparison a...
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
Comparisons of the input geometric parameters and extracted parameters in the simulation study.</p
<p>(a) Initial contour set by the CHT. (b) LBF. (c) CV. (d) NCV. (e) SMLV. (f) Ground truth.</p
<p>The comparisons of the true 3D feature points and the estimated 3D feature points of the first fr...
<p>Comparison of visualization techniques on the basis of typical measurement systems.</p
Comparison between tilted plate and flat plate visualizing how results change based on angle.</p
(a) Degraded image; (b) First input image; (c) Second input image; (d) Third input image; (e) Ours.<...
The comparison between optimal cubic and cylindrical geometries for side and isometric views based o...
Fig. 1: Visual analysis for mesh comparison. We propose YMCA, a system that combines explicit encodi...
Comparison of representative visibility level in experiments 0-3, consecutively at Fig 3 A-D.</p
The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two dat...
DOI
Add to ORKG