<p>Intra-rater agreement for the 6-group geometric classification: 3 evaluators.</p
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
The evaluation of agreement among experts in a classification task is crucial in many situations (e....
The statistical methods described in the preceding chapter for controlling for error are applicable ...
<p>Inter-rater agreement for the 6-group geometric classification: 3 evaluators at occasion 1 and oc...
The accuracies of the three-class classifications at the four CNR levels for the six classifiers.</p
<p>Inter-observer agreement between two senior graders and intra-observer agreement for senior grade...
The accuracies of the two-class classifications at the four CNR levels for the six classifiers.</p
<p><sup>1</sup><i>p</i><0.001</p><p>Inter-rater agreement of physician raters and C-AEP reviewers.</...
<p>Intraclass correlation agreement (ICC) between manual and semi-automatic approach and inter-obser...
Inter-rater agreement between CDAI and DAS 28 at 3-time points of disease activity assessment.</p
<p><sup>1</sup><i>p</i><0.001</p><p>Inter-rater agreements of C-AEP reviewers.</p
<p>Agreement between the grader 4 and grader 6 and the gold standard grade for the clinical trial su...
<p>Inter-rater- and inter-method-agreement (ICC) for the different subject groups (without discarded...
<p>Comparison of the inter-annotator and self-agreement over four evaluation measures.</p
<p>All agreements p<0.0001.</p><p>Interobserver agreement (Kappa test) of benign, probably benign, p...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
The evaluation of agreement among experts in a classification task is crucial in many situations (e....
The statistical methods described in the preceding chapter for controlling for error are applicable ...
<p>Inter-rater agreement for the 6-group geometric classification: 3 evaluators at occasion 1 and oc...
The accuracies of the three-class classifications at the four CNR levels for the six classifiers.</p
<p>Inter-observer agreement between two senior graders and intra-observer agreement for senior grade...
The accuracies of the two-class classifications at the four CNR levels for the six classifiers.</p
<p><sup>1</sup><i>p</i><0.001</p><p>Inter-rater agreement of physician raters and C-AEP reviewers.</...
<p>Intraclass correlation agreement (ICC) between manual and semi-automatic approach and inter-obser...
Inter-rater agreement between CDAI and DAS 28 at 3-time points of disease activity assessment.</p
<p><sup>1</sup><i>p</i><0.001</p><p>Inter-rater agreements of C-AEP reviewers.</p
<p>Agreement between the grader 4 and grader 6 and the gold standard grade for the clinical trial su...
<p>Inter-rater- and inter-method-agreement (ICC) for the different subject groups (without discarded...
<p>Comparison of the inter-annotator and self-agreement over four evaluation measures.</p
<p>All agreements p<0.0001.</p><p>Interobserver agreement (Kappa test) of benign, probably benign, p...
Side-to-stide comparison within the three studied groups in terms of analysed parameters.</p
The evaluation of agreement among experts in a classification task is crucial in many situations (e....
The statistical methods described in the preceding chapter for controlling for error are applicable ...
DOI
Add to ORKG